Selecting Translations for Young Readers: An Educational Framework for Reading Foreign Literary Works
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aims: Selecting suitable translations of foreign literature for young readers requires attention not only to textual fidelity but also to accessibility, aesthetic quality, age appropriateness, and educational purpose. However, teachers often lack a systematic basis for comparing editions. This conceptual article proposes an educational framework for selecting Chinese translations of foreign literary works and reinterprets translation principles for literary education.
Methodology: The framework was developed through pedagogical reflection, illustrative comparison of Chinese translations, and engagement with scholarship on translation, children’s literature, and literary education. Chinese versions of The Little Mermaid, The Happy Prince, and The Little Prince were used as illustrative cases rather than as an empirical sample.
Results: The proposed framework comprises three stages: preliminary screening of translators and editions, professional educational evaluation, and reader-oriented validation. Yan Fu’s principles of faithfulness, expressiveness, and elegance are reformulated as knowledge, language, and aesthetic engagement. The illustrative comparisons demonstrate how textual completeness, lexical choice, readability, imagery, rhythm, tone, and literary style can shape educational suitability. The framework encourages teachers to consider both source-text relationships and young readers’ experiences.
Conclusion: Translation selection should be treated as an educational judgment rather than a choice based solely on reputation, availability, or literal accuracy. The framework offers teachers a conceptually grounded and applicable process for selecting translated literature. Future empirical studies should examine its reliability, classroom usability, and effects on reading comprehension, engagement, and literary development across age groups and educational contexts.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
Copyright of all articles published in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is retained by the author(s).
All articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Users may read, download, copy, distribute, and share the content for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Modification, adaptation, or commercial use of the content is not permitted.
License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References
An, S. (2021). Direct and indirect outbound translation of Korean children's literature: The Hen Who Dreamed She Could Fly. The Journal of Translation Studies, 22(5), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2021.22.5.004
Chen, X. (2023). The role of childhood nostalgia in the reception of translated children’s literature. Target, 35(4), 595–620. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21103.xue
General Office of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, & General Office of the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China. (2025, June 5). Jiaoyubu bangongting Zhongyang Xuanchuanbu bangongting guanyu shenru shishi quanguo qingshaonian xuesheng dushu xingdong de tongzhi [Notice on further implementing the national reading initiative for young students]. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3321/202506/t20250605_1193064.html
Lathey, G. (2016). Translating children’s literature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753515
Lin, Y. (2012). Lun “gongneng jia zhongcheng” shijiao xia de “Kuaile wangzi” Hanyi ben [Chinese translations of The Happy Prince from the perspective of “function plus loyalty”]. Journal of Sichuan University of Arts and Science, 22(1), 124–127. https://dxsz.cbpt.cnki.net/portal/journal/portal/client/paper/64f20b6947197efeb5d3a6fc5200843e
Momeni, S. M., Aerila, J.-A., & Routarinne, S. (2026). Classroom applications of the reader-response approach in primary and secondary education: A systematic review (1989–2024). L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 26(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2026.26.1.962
Oittinen, R. (2000). Translating for children. Garland Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203902004
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
Puurtinen, T. (1989). Assessing acceptability in translated children’s books. Target, 1(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.1.2.05puu
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press. https://catalog.mercyhurst.edu/bib/47584
Saint-Exupéry, A. de. (1981). Xiao wang zi [The Little Prince] (Y. Hu, Trans.). China Children’s Publishing House. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB20647650 (Original work published 1943)
Saint-Exupéry, A. de. (2009). Xiao wang zi [The Little Prince] (K. Zhou, Trans.). Shanghai Translation Publishing House. https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/en/books/R100000136-I1970867909847430047 (Original work published 1943)
Saint-Exupéry, A. de. (2013). Xiao wang zi [The Little Prince] (H. Guo, Trans.). Beijing October Literature and Art Publishing House. https://www.hongniba.com.cn/bookclub/bookinfo.jsp?bookid=30004813&module=age (Original work published 1943)
Saint-Exupéry, A. de. (2016). Xiao wang zi [The Little Prince] (A. Ma, Trans.). Jiangsu Phoenix Literature and Art Publishing House. https://book.douban.com/subject/26671195/ (Original work published 1943)
Van Coillie, J., & McMartin, J. (Eds.). (2020). Children’s literature in translation: Texts and contexts. Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17rvx8q
Zhang, M. (2013). An inquiry into Yan Fu’s translation theory of faithfulness, expressiveness, and elegance: The beginning of China’s modern translation theory. Trans-Humanities, 6(3), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.22901/trans.2013.6.3.179