Submissions

Author Guidelines

Human Research Ethics

Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) takes research ethics extremely seriously and prioritizes safeguarding the safety and well-being of study participants who are human volunteers, as well as their human rights and dignity. Any study publications that involve experiments with human subjects must explicitly state that researchers must receive both a research ethics certificate and permission from the Human Research Ethics Committee. The approval for publication of an article is subject to the consideration of the journal editorial board, which is final.

 

Guidelines on AI-Generated Content

JELR acknowledges the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate valuable information for articles submitted to the journal for prospective publication. The magazine does, however, recognize the need to ensure that AI-generated content is managed appropriately and morally.
This policy describes the journal's guidelines for using AI-generated content in published articles.
1. Definition of AI-generated content
For the purposes of this policy, any content created or substantially modified by an AI system is referred to as AI-generated content. This includes both work created wholly by an AI system and content created by a human author that has undergone substantial AI system modification.
2. Principles
JELR will only publish AI-generated content that complies with the following rules:
* The AI system that produced the content cannot be recognized as one of the authors when it is submitted for potential publication.
* A detailed explanation of the AI system that produced the information must be included in the article.
* The human author of the article must be credited.
* AI-generated content ought to be original and plagiarism-free.
* AI-generated content must be reliable and accurate.
* The content produced by AI must not mislead or deceive readers.
3. Procedure
Authors who wish to submit articles with AI-generated content must provide JELR with the following information:
* A detailed description of the AI algorithm that generated the content.
* A copy of the original input data used to generate the content.
* A copy of the AI-generated content.
* A statement acknowledging the human author's contribution to the work.
JELR will evaluate the AI-generated content and decide if it is suitable for publication.
4. Enforcement
JELR reserves the right to reject or retract any article that does not comply with this policy.

Article Retraction Policy
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. Retractions are issued in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines to ensure transparency, accountability, and trust.
1.Grounds for Retraction
Retractions will be issued when published findings are found to be unreliable due to:
1.1 Proven misconduct, plagiarism, or duplicate publication.
1.2 Data fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of results.
1.3 Copyright infringement or ethical breaches.
1.4 Failure to disclose significant conflicts of interest.
1.5 Absence of required institutional review board (IRB) approval for research involving human subjects or animals.
1.6 Fundamental errors in research design or methodology that undermine reproducibility and validity.
2. Retraction Procedure
2.1 Retractions may be initiated by the editor, editorial board, or publisher, sometimes following concerns raised by reviewers, authors, or readers.
2.2 Minor editorial errors will not result in retraction; instead, corrections or errata will be issued.
2.3 When a retraction is necessary, a formal Retraction Notice will be published in the journal, linked to the original article, and stating the specific reason for retraction.
3. Availability and Marking of Retracted Articles
3.1 Retracted articles will remain accessible online to preserve the scholarly record, but will be clearly marked as “Retracted” on every page.
3.2 The Retraction Notice will accompany the article and be freely accessible to readers.
3.3 The aim is to maintain openness and allow the academic community to understand the reason for the retraction.

 

Guidelines for Manuscript Preparation and Submission

The double-blind, peer-reviewed Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is published every two months. Spread the word about important theoretical, experimental, and empirical studies in the disciplines of education and learning reviews. As long as each article is assessed by two to three experienced peer reviewers, the editorial team of JELR is delighted and incredibly honored to accept the work of any academic, research, or review article in the field of education and learning, as well as other fields related to education, from any agency for publication in JELR.

Articles that have already been published or are being considered for publication by another journal will not be accepted by the Journal. Submissions must adhere to the JELR Publishing Ethics and Author Guidelines.

For the convenience of the editors in manuscript consideration, manuscripts should be prepared and submitted using the following guidelines:

 

Types of Articles
1. Academic Articles:
The characteristics of an academic article are a scholarly analysis of the topic, a new thought put forth based on information gleaned from one's own or others' academic work, and an article meant to educate readers. An academic article outlines the difficulties, objectives, and recommendations. It provides an analysis based on research, findings, and a theoretical framework from a variety of sources, such as books, academic journals, the internet, etc. An academic publication also suggests guidelines for problem-solving.
2. Research Articles:
A research paper is a structured summary of the results of a study. The problem statement, its significance, the study's objective, and the research technique are all discussed.
The research article includes the title page, abstract, and article contents. The title page should have the following order: title, author, department, faculty, and university. In the event that the author is a student, the degree program, major, university, advisory committee, and the educational background of the advisory committee should all be indicated.
The abstract contains the significance of the study, research methods (including the population, sample, instruments, and statistics used), research findings, and conclusion. There should be no more than 300–500 words in the abstract. The author is also limited to using no more than five keywords.
The Contents of the article start  with an introduction that should begin with the problem statement and significance, followed by the study's purpose and hypothesis, then the research technique, which includes the population and sample, instruments, data collection, and data analysis. The study's findings, discussion, and conclusion are also included in the contents. The materials and methodology sections should provide explanations of techniques and general approaches. The section on research outcomes should include an explanation of the experiment's findings. The discussion part should contain comparisons between the findings of the experiment and the work of other researchers. The conclusion section should contain the research study's findings according to the purpose or purposes.
3. Review Articles:
A review article is an academic work that critically assesses the most recent developments in a specialized subject and is distinguished by a comprehensive study that combines modern, in-depth analysis and synthesis of knowledge management. It offers suggestions for additional research and advancement in the area.
The review article provides a well-rounded perspective on a fascinating subject. The title, author name, author address, and conclusion are all found on the opening page of a review article. The purpose of the conclusion is to inform the audience about the article's background and intriguing topic. No more than five keywords may be specified by the author.
The contents of a review article, the fascinating problem of the essay is addressed in the opening, and a point is made at the end before going on to each of the sub-issues. A review article also invites readers to consider other fascinating subjects.
The author should carefully review the information that is pertinent to the piece, paying particular attention to the most recent information. A review article must show the topic's intriguing evolution. The knowledge offered must be comprehensible to advanced students or intended for a broader audience in other fields rather than being specifically targeted at the audience in the field.

 

Ethics and Publication Integrity Policy

The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity and publication ethics. All authors, editors, and reviewers are expected to uphold these standards throughout the publication process.

Before submitting a manuscript, authors must read and agree to the journal’s Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS), which defines the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in scholarly publishing.

This policy is fully aligned with international best practices and guidelines from the following organizations:
• Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices
• World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Editorial Policy Statements
• Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

By submitting to JELR, authors confirm that they have reviewed and accepted these ethical requirements. Non-compliance with the stated policies may lead to rejection, correction, or retraction of published articles, following COPE guidelines and the journal’s misconduct procedures.

 

Manuscript Preparation

Journal Template

Article example

Title [14 points]

Author’s name and surname[10 points]......................................................................

Organization and country [10 points]......................................................................

E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, RCID ID: https://orcid.org/xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

Received xx/xx/20xx                       Revised xx/xx/20xx                   Accepted xx/xx/20xx

Abstract [10 points]

Background and Aim: [10 points] …………………………………………………………………..

Methodology: [10 points]………………………………………………………………………………..

Results: [10 points]………………………………………………………………………………………..

Conclusion: [10 points]…………………………………………………………………………………..

Keywords: [10 points]…………….;……………;……………………….

 

Introduction  [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Objectives  [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Literature review [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Conceptual Framework [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Methodology [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Results [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Discussion [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Knowledge Contribution [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

Recommendation [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point]………………….……………………

References [11 points]

…………[Detail 11 point] use APA style 7th………..……..

***Avoid citing websites as they may not be considered academically reliable.

 

The Manuscript Detail

1. The Author's information must be included; All authors must have complete information.
- Name and Surname 
-  Affiliated organization and Country
- Author's E-mail:
- ORCID ID: You can register by following this link: https://orcid.org/register 

2. Type the article using Microsoft Office Word. Text is required to be single-spaced on A4 (8.5” x 11”) paper with 1-inch margins on all sides. The text must be in One-column format and single-sided. Number pages consecutively.

3. The fonts: use the following formatting guidelines:

3.1 Use 14-point Times New Roman for the title.

3.2 Use 10-point Times New Roman for the name of the author.

3.3 Use 11-point Times New Roman for main topics.

3.4 Use 11-point Times New Roman for subtopics.

3.5 Use 11-point Times New Roman for all boldface.

3.6 Use 11-point Times New Roman for the academic title and address of the author.

4. The length of the article should not be more than 20 pages long (including table illustrations and references).

5. Tables, pictures, figures, diagrams, and graphs can be inserted into the contents of the article in black and white or in color. Insert only the necessary ones and number them consecutively according to the contents. The names of the tables have to be typed above the tables. The names of the pictures, diagrams, and graphs have to be typed below them with a brief and complete caption. The image fields have to be separated from the manuscript and attached as *.JPG, *.PNG, or *.GIF files.

6. For reference, use the APA Style version 7 (American Psychological Association) formatting and style according to the following guidelines: Type the publishing year in the bracket after the name of the authors, as in the example shown below:

6.1 Name of the author. // (Publishing Year). //Title.//Publishing Volume. //Publishing Place/:/Publishing company.

6.2 Name of the author. // (Publishing Year). //” Title of article,”//Title of periodical or journal. //Volume(issue)/;/Page.

6.3 Name of the author. // (Publishing Year). //Title.//Thesis//City/:/University.

7. The academic work sent to be considered for publication has not been previously published elsewhere and has not been under consideration by any other journal.

8.  Manuscript Submission, the author can submit the manuscript at https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/about  

References Example :

1.Books/textbooks

Author's name. (Year of publication). Title of the book. Time of publication. Place of publication: Publisher.

Example:

Charoenwongsak, K. (2003). Thinking about the future. Bangkok: Printing base printing house.

Brauer, R. L. (2005). Safety and Health for Engineers. 2^nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

 2. Articles from journals or magazines

Name of the author of the article. (Year of publication). Article title. Name of the journal. Year (issue): page number.

Example:

Kenaphoom, S. (2015). Factors of self-reliance and factors of technology management influencing the effectiveness of community enterprises in Maha Sarakham Province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 9 (3), 53-66

Strauss, W. M., Malaney, G. W., & Tanner, R. D. (1984). The Impedance Method for Monitoring Total Coliforms in Wastewaters. Folia Microbiologica, 29 (2), 162-169.

3. Newspaper articles

Name of the author of the article. (Year of publication). Article title. Newspaper name. Date of publication, the month of publication, and the page number on which the article appears.

Example:

Intrawut, P. (2001). Prehistoric class society in China. Bangkok Business, July 21: 6-7.

Di Rado, A. (1995). Trekking through college: Classes explore modern society using the world of Star Trek. Los Angeles Times, 15 March: A3.

4. Thesis/Thesis/Independent Study

Author's name. (Year of publication). Thesis title. Name, type, and branch of thesis: Name of an educational institution.

 Example:

Charoenboon, Y. (1994). A study of components related to classroom research of secondary school teachers in Bangkok. Master of Education Thesis: Chulalongkorn University. 

Wilfley, D. E. (1989). Interpersonal Analyses of Bulimia. Doctoral Dissertation: University of Missouri.

Almeida, D. M. (1990). Fathers’ Participation in Family Work. Master’s Thesis: University of Victoria.

5. Website reference

Author's name. (Year of the publication of the information on the Internet). Title/Article Title. Retrieved on Date, Month, Year Searched from URL..................................

 Example:

Kanchanawasee, S. (2005). Traditional test theory. Retrieved on 25 August 2010 from http://www.niets.or.th/ aboutus_matter.html

United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Organic Gases: Volatile Organic Compounds-VOCs. Retrieved on June 22, 2009, from: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/voc.html. 

6. Interview reference

Interviewee. (Year of interview). The subject of the interview (interview). Position, agency, or address. D/M/Y at the interview.

Example:

Carter, J. (2018). What is the NPG (Interview)? CEO of Siam Co. Ltd., Siam Co. Ltd Bangrak, Bangkok, 23 April 2018.

7. The results are presented at academic conferences and seminars.

Author's name. (Presentation year). “The title of the work”. Meeting name, D/M/Y at the meeting or seminar, meeting place.

Example:

Kenaphoom, S. (2014). “The Creating a Survey Research Conceptual Framework of Public Administration” The Academic conference and presentation of National and International research, the 36^th academic conference of Thailand Education Relation on “Educational Leadership and Development toward ASEAN Community”, 24 January 2014, Udon Ratchathani: Udon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Journal Template

Article example

All manuscripts must be prepared in a Microsoft Word document file format and submitted online. The template for manuscript preparation must be strictly followed.    

 

Publication Ethics for Authors
Authorship: All authors must have agreed to the submission and the order of their names on the title page. They must also have agreed that the corresponding author may act on their behalf throughout the editorial review and publication process.
Originality and Plagiarism: Manuscripts of research articles submitted to JELR must not have been published previously and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. The author(s) must ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the author(s) have used the work and/or words of others, this must be appropriately cited or quoted and listed in the references. Any attempt at plagiarism, data fabrication/falsification, or citation manipulation will result in the rejection of the submitted manuscript.  JELR reserves the right to use plagiarism-detecting software to screen submitted papers.
Human Subjects: If the research work involves the use of human participants/volunteers, the author(s) should ensure that all procedures are performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines. Authors must include a statement in the manuscript that approval from an ethics committee was obtained for any experiments/clinical trials involving human subjects. Authors must state the approval code in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All funding sources must be disclosed in the acknowledgments, and any conflicts of interest must be stated. All submissions must include disclosure of any relationship that could be viewed as a potential conflict of interest. 

Duties of Authors
1. The article submission must be certified by the author as new work and has never been presented in a proceeding or published form anywhere else.
2. For Articles submitted for publication, the authors must present reports of true information arising from research without distorting information or providing false information.
3. If someone else's work is used in the author's work, the author's work must be referenced and appear in the reference list at the end of the article.
4. Articles submitted for publication must follow the format specified in the recommendations of the original thesis submission of the journal; otherwise, the editors will not accept such articles.
5. An article whose author's name appears must be a person who takes part in the actual research, and the editors will consider the feasibility of the article.
6. The article must include the source of funding supporting this research in the acknowledgment (if any).
7. The authors must specify conflicts of interest (if any).

 

COPE Statement
Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR)
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is firmly committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in academic publishing. To achieve this, the journal fully endorses and adheres to the principles, guidelines, and best practices established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
1. Alignment with COPE Principles
JELR follows the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors, the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers, and the COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.
All stakeholders — including authors, editors, and reviewers — are expected to act in accordance with these ethical standards.
2. Responsibilities of Authors
2.1 Authors must ensure that their submissions are original, accurate, and free from plagiarism or unethical practices.
2.2 Duplicate or redundant publication, falsification of data, inappropriate authorship credit, and undisclosed conflicts of interest are strictly prohibited.
2.3 Authors are required to disclose all relevant conflicts of interest and confirm compliance with ethical approval requirements for research involving human participants or animals.
3. Responsibilities of Editors
3.1 Editors must maintain editorial independence and impartiality throughout the review and publication process.
3.2 They are responsible for ensuring that manuscripts are evaluated solely on their academic merit, without regard to the authors’ gender, nationality, institutional affiliation, or personal relationships.
3.3 Editors must handle all allegations of misconduct following COPE Flowcharts and ensure that corrective actions (e.g., corrections, retractions, expressions of concern) are taken when necessary.
4. Responsibilities of Reviewers
4.1 Reviewers must provide objective, fair, and constructive evaluations of manuscripts.
4.2 They must decline assignments if conflicts of interest exist and are required to treat manuscripts as confidential documents.
4.3 Reviewers should identify ethical concerns (such as plagiarism, data manipulation, or undisclosed COIs) and report them to the editorial office.
5. Handling Misconduct
5.1 JELR addresses all cases of alleged or proven research and publication misconduct — including plagiarism, data falsification, authorship disputes, duplicate submissions, and unethical research practices — in strict accordance with COPE Flowcharts and Guidelines.
5.2 Actions may include rejection of the manuscript, retraction of published articles, notification of institutions, and blacklisting of offending authors or reviewers.
6. Transparency and Accountability
6.1 JELR ensures transparency in the peer review process, fairness in editorial decisions, and accountability in publishing practices.
6.2 COI statements, funding sources, and ethical approvals (where applicable) will be disclosed in published articles.
6.3 The journal is dedicated to providing clear corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern whenever errors or ethical breaches are identified.
7. Commitment to COPE
By adopting and adhering to COPE’s standards, the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) affirms its commitment to maintaining the highest level of academic integrity and ethical publishing practices, ensuring trust among authors, reviewers, editors, and readers worldwide.
For more information about COPE and its guidelines, please visit: https://publicationethics.org.

 

Research Misconduct and Plagiarism Policy
Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR)
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity. Any form of research misconduct is strictly prohibited and will be dealt with according to international publishing ethics standards, including COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines.
1. Definition of Misconduct
Research misconduct includes, but is not limited to:
1.1 Plagiarism: Copying or closely paraphrasing another’s work without proper attribution.
1.2 Self-plagiarism (redundant publication): Republishing the same content in multiple outlets without disclosure.
1.3 Data fabrication or falsification: Inventing or altering data, methods, or results.
1.4 Improper authorship: Excluding legitimate contributors, including “guest” or “gift” authorship, or disputes regarding contribution.
1.5 Ethics violations: Failure to obtain appropriate approvals for studies involving human participants or animals.
1.6 Conflicts of interest: Failure to disclose financial or personal interests that may influence interpretation.
2. Plagiarism Screening
2.1 All submitted manuscripts are subject to plagiarism detection using reliable software before peer review.
2.2 A similarity index exceeding 20% (excluding references, tables, and standard text) may lead to rejection or a request for revision.
2.3 Authors may be required to provide explanations or evidence of originality.
3. Investigating Misconduct
3.1 Allegations of misconduct may be raised by editors, reviewers, or readers.
3.2 The Editorial Board will conduct an initial assessment and may contact the authors for clarification.
3.3 If necessary, the case will be referred to the authors’ institution or funding body for further investigation.
4. Corrective Actions
Depending on the severity of the misconduct, the Editorial Board may take the following actions:
4.1 Reject the manuscript before publication.
4.2 Request corrections or clarifications for minor issues.
4.3 Issue a retraction of a published article, with a formal notice stating the reason.
4.4 Publish an expression of concern when investigation is ongoing.
4.5 Ban offending authors from submitting to JELR for a specified period.
4.6 Notify relevant institutions, funders, or authorities in serious cases.
5. Appeals
5.1 Authors may appeal editorial decisions related to misconduct by submitting a written explanation.
2.2 Appeals will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and, if appropriate, by external advisors following COPE procedures.

Article Processing Charges (APC) Policy
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) does not charge any article processing charges (APCs) or submission fees. All articles are published free of cost for authors.
This policy reflects JELR’s commitment to promoting open access to high-quality research without financial barriers.

Scan to contact via the LINE application.

 

Ownership and Management

DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion.
No. 139/26 Theenanon, Talad Sub-district, Mueang Mahasarakham District,
Mahasarakham Province, Thailand, 44000 Tel: +66817413978, or +66946398978.
Email: dr.keninstitute@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Dr.keninstitute