Journal of Education and Learning Reviews

 

ISSN: 3057-0387 (Online)

Crossref Member name: Dr. Ken Institute of Academic Development and Promotion
DOI prefix (Crossref): 10.60027

 

About Journal

Journal of Education and Learning Reviews

ISSN 3057-0387 (Online)

Crossref Member name: Dr. Ken Institute of Academic Development and Promotion
DOI prefix (Crossref): 10.60027

Abstracting & Indexing / Discoverability

About Journal

The DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion publishes the double-blind, peer-reviewed, international, open-access Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR). By disseminating exceptional research findings, specialized knowledge, and expert discussions on topics that represent the diversity of the Education and Learning field, it seeks to advance excellence. The journal publishes articles on a wide range of educational subjects.

Publishing Policy - Aims and Scope

The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing knowledge and practice in education. JELR emphasizes research that addresses key challenges and innovations in the following thematic areas:
1. Learning Sciences and Pedagogy
-Teaching and learning theories
-Curriculum design and development
-Assessment and evaluation in education
-Teacher professional development
-Inclusive education and equity in learning
2. Educational Technology
-Digital and online learning environments
-Learning analytics and data-driven education
-Mobile learning, e-learning, and blended learning
-Artificial intelligence in education
-Gamification and immersive learning (AR/VR)
3. Educational Leadership and Policy
-School leadership and management
-Higher education governance and development
-Educational reforms and international policy studies
-Comparative and international education
-Quality assurance and accreditation in education
JELR welcomes original research articles, reviews, and case studies that contribute to improving educational theory, practice, and policy at both local and global levels.

Type of Articles
1. A Research Article is a report of the results of a systematic study, research, or development.
2. An Academic Article is a work of writing an interesting topic in which the author presents new knowledge by using theories, concepts, and related research results as information sources.
3. A Review Article is an article that combines theories, concepts, and research results on many subjects. the author will synthesize the literature to compile it into a conclusion or argument on a particular matter, which is a review of the academic progress of that matter.

Guidelines on AI-Generated Content

JELR acknowledges the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate valuable information for articles submitted to the journal for prospective publication. The magazine does, however, recognize the need to ensure that AI-generated content is managed appropriately and morally.
This policy describes the journal's guidelines for using AI-generated content in published articles.
1. Definition of AI-generated content
For the purposes of this policy, any content created or substantially modified by an AI system is referred to as AI-generated content. This includes both work created wholly by an AI system and content created by a human author that has undergone substantial AI system modification.
2. Principles
JELR will only publish AI-generated content that complies with the following rules:
* The AI system that produced the content cannot be recognized as one of the authors when it is submitted for potential publication.
* A detailed explanation of the AI system that produced the information must be included in the article.
* The human author of the article must be credited.
* AI-generated content ought to be original and plagiarism-free.
* AI-generated content must be reliable and accurate.
* The content produced by AI must not mislead or deceive readers.
3. Procedure
Authors who wish to submit articles with AI-generated content must provide JELR with the following information:
* A detailed description of the AI algorithm that generated the content.
* A copy of the original input data used to generate the content.
* A copy of the AI-generated content.
* A statement acknowledging the human author's contribution to the work.
JELR will evaluate the AI-generated content and decide if it is suitable for publication.
4. Enforcement
JELR reserves the right to reject or retract any article that does not comply with this policy.

Article Retraction Policy
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. Retractions are issued in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines to ensure transparency, accountability, and trust.
1.Grounds for Retraction
Retractions will be issued when published findings are found to be unreliable due to:
1.1 Proven misconduct, plagiarism, or duplicate publication.
1.2 Data fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of results.
1.3 Copyright infringement or ethical breaches.
1.4 Failure to disclose significant conflicts of interest.
1.5 Absence of required institutional review board (IRB) approval for research involving human subjects or animals.
1.6 Fundamental errors in research design or methodology that undermine reproducibility and validity.
2. Retraction Procedure
2.1 Retractions may be initiated by the editor, editorial board, or publisher, sometimes following concerns raised by reviewers, authors, or readers.
2.2 Minor editorial errors will not result in retraction; instead, corrections or errata will be issued.
2.3 When a retraction is necessary, a formal Retraction Notice will be published in the journal, linked to the original article, and stating the specific reason for retraction.
3. Availability and Marking of Retracted Articles
3.1 Retracted articles will remain accessible online to preserve the scholarly record, but will be clearly marked as “Retracted” on every page.
3.2 The Retraction Notice will accompany the article and be freely accessible to readers.
3.3 The aim is to maintain openness and allow the academic community to understand the reason for the retraction.

Publication Frequency

Release schedule of six issues per year:

• Issue 1 January – February
• Issue 2 March – April
• Issue 3 May-June
• Issue 4 July-August
• Issue 5 September – October
• Issue 6 November– December

 

Journal Specific Requirements

• Research articles, academic articles, and review articles that have a reference list.
• The articles that will be selected must contain content that is of social interest and academic value.
• The articles must not be translated articles or interview articles.
• All published articles are academically reviewed by at least 2 peer reviewers (Double-Blind Peer Review).
• Any academic opinions on the articles published in this journal belong to the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR), if any person infringes the copyright, the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) will take legal action.
• The editor of the journal does not reserve the right to refer to the contents of this journal in other writings.

Journal History

The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR), ISSN 3057-0387 (Online) established in 2024 by the DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion, Thailand, publishes 6 issues (Bi-Monthly per issue) annually.

• Appearing in the Google Scholar database from 2024
• Digital object identifiers (DOIs) have been identified in Crossref DOI
• Appearing in CrossRef from 2024
• Appearing in the Shibata database from 2024
• Appearing in the SEMANTIC Scholas database from 2025 

Plagiarism Policy

The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) enforces a strict plagiarism screening policy to ensure the originality and integrity of all submitted manuscripts.

All manuscripts are screened using the CopyCatch plagiarism detection software immediately upon submission. The system generates a similarity report within 24 hours, which is reviewed by the editorial team before the manuscript proceeds to peer review.

The acceptable similarity index threshold is below 25%, excluding references, tables, figures, and standard methodological descriptions. Manuscripts exceeding this level are either returned to authors for revision or rejected, depending on the extent and nature of overlap.

Cases of suspected plagiarism, self-plagiarism, or text recycling are handled following the COPE Flowcharts on Plagiarism.

These procedures uphold JELR’s commitment to academic honesty, ethical publishing, and compliance with the COPE Core Practices and international editorial standards.

Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable and a serious violation of academic standards. Examples of plagiarism include

• Word-for-word copying: copying parts of another person's paper verbatim without putting the copied text in quote marks and giving due credit to the original author according to the proper academic norm.
• The use of a particularly unique term or concept without acknowledging the original author or source.
• The paraphrasing or abbreviated restatement of someone else's ideas without acknowledging that another person's text has been the basis for the paraphrasing.
• False citation: material should not be attributed to a source from which it has not been obtained.
• False data: data that has been fabricated or altered in a laboratory or experiment; although not factually plagiarism, this is clearly a form of academic fraud.
• Unacknowledged multiple authors or collaboration: The contributions of each author or collaborator should be made clear.
• Self-plagiarism/double submission: the submission of the same or a very similar paper to two or more publications. 

Confidentiality & Peer Review Integrity Policy
Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR)
1. Confidentiality
1.1 All manuscripts submitted to JELR are treated as strictly confidential documents.
1.2 Editors, associate editors, and reviewers must not share, discuss, or disclose any information about a manuscript with anyone outside the official editorial and peer review process.
1.3 Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in anyone’s own research without the explicit written consent of the author(s).
2. Double-Blind Peer Review
2.1 JELR employs a double-blind peer review system: (1) Authors do not know the identity of reviewers. (2) Reviewers do not know the identity of authors.
2.3 Editors ensure that author identities are removed before manuscripts are sent for review.
2.4 Reviewers are required to provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback.
3. Reviewer Responsibilities
3.1 Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and must not retain, copy, or distribute submitted manuscripts for any purpose other than peer review.
3.2 Reviewers should decline invitations if they: (1) Have a conflict of interest with the manuscript or its authors. (2) Cannot provide an unbiased, fair, and confidential review.
3.3 Any suspected ethical issues (e.g., plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate submission) must be reported to the editorial office immediately.
4. Editorial Responsibilities
4.1 Editors must handle manuscripts with integrity and neutrality, ensuring decisions are based solely on academic merit.
4.2 Editors will assign reviewers who have the appropriate expertise and no conflicts of interest.
4.3 If confidentiality or integrity is breached, the editorial office will take corrective action following COPE guidelines.
5. Post-Review Confidentiality
5.1 Review reports, editorial decisions, and correspondence related to manuscripts are confidential and will not be disclosed publicly.
5.2 Reviewers’ identities will not be revealed to authors, unless both parties agree to disclose (e.g., in an open peer review model, if adopted in the future).

Peer Review Policy and Process
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is a bimonthly, double-blind peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to advancing theoretical, empirical, and experimental research in the field of education and learning. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous evaluation process to ensure the highest standards of academic integrity, methodological soundness, and contribution to the discipline.
Peer Review Policy
JELR adopts a double-blind peer review process, in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation. Each manuscript is reviewed by a minimum of two independent, qualified experts in the field. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, academic reputation, prior performance as reviewers, and absence of conflicts of interest. Reviewers are expected to provide evaluations that are:
• Timely: delivered within the prescribed timeframe.
• Thorough: based on careful reading and critical assessment.
• Objective: free of bias and grounded in scholarly evidence.
• Constructive: offering clear guidance for improvement.
All communication between authors and reviewers is mediated by the editorial team to ensure transparency, confidentiality, and fairness.
Peer Review Process
The JELR peer review process comprises five main stages:
1. Initial Editorial Assessment (≈1 week)
Upon submission, manuscripts are screened by the editorial office for compliance with the journal’s requirements, including:
• adherence to author guidelines and formatting standards,
• clarity and readability of language,
• plagiarism check (threshold: ≤25%),
• sufficiency and credibility of references,
• accuracy of citation and referencing style.
Manuscripts failing to meet these standards may be rejected at this stage, and authors will be notified accordingly.
2. External Peer Review (≈4–6 weeks)
Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers under the double-blind system. The review focuses on originality, theoretical and methodological rigor, significance to the field, and overall quality.
The reviewers’ recommendations are categorized as follows:
• Accept Submission
• Revision Required
• Resubmit for Review
• Resubmit Elsewhere
• Decline Submission
• See Comments
The average time to the first editorial decision is 4–6 weeks, though this may vary depending on reviewer availability and manuscript complexity. The journal prioritizes quality, fairness, and academic rigor over speed.
3. Editorial Decision and Notification (≈1–2 weeks)
The editor synthesizes the reviewers’ feedback and issues one of the following decisions:
• Accept or Accept with Minor Revisions → progresses to revision/finalization.
• Major Revision Required → authors are invited to revise and resubmit for further review.
• Reject → manuscript is not accepted for publication.
Authors are informed promptly of the decision, together with reviewers’ comments.
4. Author Revision (≈1–3 weeks)
Authors whose manuscripts require revision must:
• address all reviewer and editor comments point-by-point,
• provide a detailed response letter outlining changes,
• resubmit the revised manuscript and revision form within the specified timeframe.
Failure to respond adequately may result in rejection.
5. Final Evaluation of Revisions (≈1 week)
The editorial office reviews the revised submission to ensure that all required changes have been incorporated satisfactorily. In some cases, the revised manuscript may be sent back to reviewers for further assessment.
Once the revision meets scholarly and editorial standards, the manuscript is formally accepted and forwarded to production for publication.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides instant open access to its material on the principle that making research openly available promotes a more extensive global exchange of information.

 

Open Access Statement

The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews permits anyone to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the complete texts of its articles for any other acceptable purpose as part of its dedication to open access for scientific work. As soon as a manuscript is published in this journal, it is available for free. Our articles are free for readers to use for their own scholarly purposes.

The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.. Because of this, articles can be freely reprinted as long as they are used for non-commercial purposes and have the correct citation information. All writers who submit work to the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews agree to these terms of publication.

Data Availability Statement

The authors will release the raw data supporting the findings of this study without unnecessary delay.

 

Conflict of Interest Policy

Articles would be published with statements or supporting documents declaring:

Author conflicts of interest; sources of support for the work, including names of sponsors and an explanation of their involvement, if any, in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; report writing; the decision to submit the report for publication; or a statement indicating that the supporting source was not involved in any of these aspects; and whether the authors had access to the study data, along with a description of the kind and extent of that access, and whether it is still in place.

In a study funded by a funder with a financial or proprietary interest in the results, editors may ask authors to provide a statement like "I had full access to all of the data in this study and I take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis" to bolster their claims.

Therefore, the authors attest that there were no financial or economic ties that could be interpreted as a potential conflict of interest during the study.

 

Publisher’s Note

The publisher, editors, reviewers, and their affiliated organizations do not necessarily endorse the claims made in this article; they are the only authors' opinions. Any product discussed in this article or any claim made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or promoted by the magazine.

Open Access and Copyright Policy
All articles published in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) are open access and freely available online immediately upon publication.
Authors retain the copyright of their work. Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
This license allows readers to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the original work is properly cited and not modified or adapted in any way.
For more details, please see the license terms at:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

  

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses supplied on this journal website will only be used for the reasons specified by this journal; they will not be shared with any other parties or used for any other purpose.

 

Metadata & Indexing Policy
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) adheres to international standards for metadata creation and harvesting to maximize the visibility and discoverability of its scholarly content.
All published articles are assigned a permanent Crossref DOI and deposited in machine-readable JATS XML format.
Metadata — including titles, abstracts, keywords, authors, affiliations, and references — is made openly available via our OAI-PMH service at: [insert OAI URL].
This ensures compatibility with major indexing services and facilitates seamless harvesting by international databases such as ERIC, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
The journal is committed to maintaining high-quality metadata to support long-term accessibility and interoperability across digital platforms.
By implementing these practices, JELR guarantees that its scholarly output is globally visible, citable, and permanently accessible in alignment with best practices in academic publishing.

 

Archiving Policy
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) ensures the long-term preservation of all published content through multiple trusted digital archiving systems:
LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe): Provides a distributed archiving system via a worldwide network of participating libraries, ensuring redundancy and security by preserving multiple copies of content.
Portico: A community-supported digital preservation service that guarantees the long-term survival and accessibility of scholarly literature for future generations.
PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN): As an OJS-based journal, JELR participates in the PKP PN for decentralized archiving and additional redundancy.
Crossref DOI System: All articles are assigned permanent DOIs, ensuring persistent identification and discoverability even if the primary website is unavailable.
With these combined services, JELR guarantees permanent accessibility of its scholarly content, even in the event of technical issues or discontinuation of the journal’s primary website. This policy complies with international best practices for digital preservation of scholarly journals.

 

Article Processing Charges (APC) Policy
The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) does not charge any article processing charges (APCs) or submission fees. All articles are published free of cost for authors.
This policy reflects JELR’s commitment to promoting open access to high-quality research without financial barriers.

Scan to contact via the LINE application

 

Ownership and Management

DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion.
No. 139/26 Theenanon, Talad Sub-district, Mueang Mahasarakham District,
Mahasarakham Province, Thailand, 44000
Tel: +6681-741-3978, +66946398978
Email: dr.keninstitute@gmail.com 
Facebook: https://web.facebook.com/Kenaphoom/
Website:  https://drkeninstitute.or.th/home

This is an Open Access journal, by DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion, (Thailand).

All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.