Journal of Education and Learning Reviews https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS <p><strong>Journal of Education and Learning Reviews</strong></p> <p><strong>ISSN 3057-0387 (Online)</strong></p> <p><strong>Crossref Member name: Dr. Ken Institute of Academic Development and Promotion<br />DOI prefix (Crossref): 10.60027</strong></p> <p><a href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/3057-0387" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong><img src="https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/drkeninstitute/mceclip3.png" /></strong></a></p> <p><strong><a href="https://search.crossref.org/search/works?q=Journal+of+Education+and+Learning+Reviews+10.60027%2Fjelr.&amp;from_ui=yes" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/drkeninstitute/mceclip2.png" width="288" height="86" /></a></strong></p> <p><strong><a href="https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AwrjJkSLuQ1nbQIAgj5XNyoA;_ylc=X1MDMjc2NjY3OQRfcgMyBGZyMgNzYi10b3AEZ3ByaWQDcGZSdHFYQ0hRdXluT0NZN1dpX0JtQQRuX3JzbHQDMARuX3N1Z2cDMARvcmlnaW4Dc2VhcmNoLnlhaG9vLmNvbQRwb3MDMARwcXN0cgMEcHFzdHJsAzAEcXN0cmwDMjIEcXVlcnkDUmVzZWFyY2hHYXRlJTIwMzA1Ny0wMzg3BHRfc3RtcAMxNzI4OTUyNzgz?p=ResearchGate+3057-0387&amp;fr2=sb-top" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/drkeninstitute/blobid1.png" alt="ResearchGate - find and share research – Telegraph" /></a></strong></p> <p><strong><a href="https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=%22Journal%20of%20Education%20and%20Learning%20Reviews%22&amp;sort=relevance" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/dr.keninstitute@gmail.com/blobid0-fb48de0b973f3100ad207b74b43067f8.png" alt="Semantic Scholar | Frequently Asked Questions" width="346" height="62" /></a></strong></p> <h1><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iq97FmQkaGOzJzXTsxJifq00vBXdIYxRK2zTn828KKM/edit#heading=h.tzb9xiqmpay7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ThaiJO User Manual</a> </h1> <h3> </h3> <p><strong>About Journal</strong></p> <p>Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is an open-access, international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal published by the DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion. It aims to promote excellence through the dissemination of high-quality research findings, specialist knowledge, and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of the Education and Learning field. Publications in the journal cover a broad range of topics related to education.</p> <p><strong>Publishing Policy - Aims and Scope</strong></p> <p>The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, publishes research articles, academic articles, and/ or review articles. This journal covered in;</p> <p><strong>Education;</strong></p> <p>- Education Administration</p> <p>- <span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">Adult and Higher Education</span></p> <p>- Secondary and Higher Education</p> <p>- Special Education</p> <p>- Applied Linguistics or language education</p> <p>- Educational Theory</p> <p>- Education Research and Methodologies.</p> <p>- Research on Language Instruction</p> <p>- Educational Philosophies</p> <p>- STEM Education</p> <p>- Instructional Technology</p> <p>- Technology Education</p> <p>- Other Educational Fields</p> <p><strong>Learning;</strong></p> <p>- Teacher Preparation</p> <p>- Teaching and Learning,</p> <p>- Inquiry-based Learning</p> <p>- Project-based Learning,</p> <p>- Problem-based Learning</p> <p>- Simulation-based Learning,</p> <p>- Child Development</p> <p>- Curriculum</p> <p>- Reading Comprehension</p> <p>- Other Learning Fields</p> <p><strong>Type of Articles</strong></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">1. Research Article is a report of the results of a systematic study, research, or development.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">2. Academic Article is a work of writing an interesting topic in which the author presents new knowledge by using theories, concepts, and related research results as information sources.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">3. Review Article is an article that combines theories, concepts, and research results on many subjects, the author will synthesize the literature to compile it into a conclusion or argument on a particular matter, which is a review of the academic progress of that matter.</span></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Publication Frequency</strong></p> <p>Release scheduled of Six issues per year:</p> <ul> <li>Issue 1 January – February</li> <li>Issue 2 March – April</li> <li>Issue 3 May-June</li> <li>Issue 4 July-August</li> <li>Issue 5 September – October</li> <li>Issue 6 November– December</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Ownership and Management</strong></p> <p>DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion.<br />No. 139/26 Theenanon, Talad Sub-district, Mueang Mahasarakham District,<br />Mahasarakham Province, Thailand, 44000 Tel: +66817413978, or +66946398978.<br />Email: <a href="mailto:dr.keninstitute@gmail.com">dr.keninstitute@gmail.com</a><br />Facebook: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Dr.keninstitute">https://www.facebook.com/Dr.keninstitute</a></p> en-US <p>Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.</p> <p><img src="https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/dr.keninstitute@gmail.com/mceclip0-8f90c14cdbab0a55c4f2ebf3386e1494.png" /></p> dr.keninstitute@gmail.com (Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sanya Kenaphoom) dr.keninstitute@gmail.com (Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sanya Kenaphoom) Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:52:34 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Guidelines for Development of Information Technology in Primary School Administration: A Case Study of Ariyamongkol Network Groups under Rayong Primary Education Service Area Office, 2 https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/961 <p>Background and Aim: <strong> Information technology advancements in elementary school administration increase productivity by simplifying duties including communication, record-keeping, and attendance. Additionally, it facilitates data-driven decision-making, which enhances student results and general school administration.</strong> This study aims to (1) investigate the use of information technology (IT) in educational administration within the Ariyamongkol Educational Network, under the Rayong Primary Educational Service Area Office, Area 2, and (2) establish guidelines for enhancing IT use in these educational institutions. The survey targeted teachers and school administrators within the Ariyamongkol Educational Network for the 2023 academic year, comprising a total population of 255 individuals. A sample of 152 participants was selected based on Krejcie and Morgan's sample size determination table using simple random sampling. Data collection was conducted through a questionnaire designed with a five-level Likert scale, and data analysis involved statistical methods such as percentage, mean, and standard deviation.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: The research utilized a quantitative survey design, employing a structured questionnaire to gather data on current IT usage, challenges, and perceived barriers in educational administration. The questionnaire was developed based on existing literature and validated through expert reviews. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics (percentages, means, and standard deviations), were performed using SPSS software to interpret the data collected from the sample.</p> <p>Results: The findings revealed that (1) current conditions, challenges, and barriers in IT usage for educational administration in the Ariyamongkol Educational Network are perceived at a high level overall, indicating a strong recognition of the importance of IT in educational processes, and (2) the principles and strategies for IT integration in administration within this network are also rated highly. Specific areas identified for improvement include enhancing IT adoption for curriculum development, facilitating budget planning, and supporting manpower planning.</p> <p>Conclusion: To promote further development, it is essential to enhance IT adoption by providing access to adequate and modern IT tools and resources. Implementing these guidelines will facilitate more efficient educational administration and improve overall educational outcomes within the Ariyamongkol Educational Network. Future research should explore the long-term impact of these IT enhancements on teaching and learning outcomes.</p> Ntapat Worapongpat, Chatchai Deepimay, Samrit Kangpheng Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/961 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Administration Management of the Honest School Project in Basic Educational Institutions Phra Chao Tak School Group Under the Rayong Primary Educational Service Area Office, Area 1 https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1010 <p>Background and Aim: The Honest School Project is designed to instill ethical practices and accountability in educational institutions, emphasizing integrity in administrative processes. Implemented within the Phra Chao Tak School Group under Rayong Primary Educational Service Area Office, Area 1, the project aims to promote transparency and ethical values among educators and students. Despite its importance, variations in management approaches based on demographics such as age and work experience have not been adequately explored. This study seeks to address this gap, examining current administrative practices and determining whether demographic factors influence implementation, ultimately contributing to more effective project policies.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: A quantitative methodology was employed in this research. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and interviews from 113 teachers involved in the Honest School Project. Participants were selected via simple random sampling, guided by Krejcie and Morgan tables. The questionnaires utilized a five-point Likert scale to evaluate management conditions and project administration effectiveness. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, were used to analyze the quantitative data. Content analysis was applied to qualitative interview responses to provide depth and context. Statistical tests were performed at a 0.05 error level to ensure reliability and validity.</p> <p>Results: The study findings indicate that the overall administration of the Honest School Project in the Phra Chao Tak School Group is rated at the highest level. Teachers perceived management practices as highly effective, aligning with the project’s goals of promoting transparency and integrity. Additionally, comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in project administration based on age or work experience, suggesting consistent implementation across demographic groups.</p> <p>Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the Honest School Project's administration within the Phra Chao Tak School Group. High levels of organizational commitment to the project’s goals were observed, with no significant demographic variations influencing management practices. These findings support the project's scalability and underline the importance of maintaining consistent ethical training across diverse educational contexts. The study provides a basis for further research on ethical program impacts in educational institutions and informs strategies for broader adoption.</p> Ntapat Worapongpat, Chokchai Petnacon Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1010 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Assessing the Level of Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies Among Criminology Students https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1356 <p>Background and Aim: Reading comprehension is essential as it significantly impacts a student's life and serves as the foundation for learning. In Criminology, strong reading skills enable students to understand legal frameworks, engage with theoretical concepts, evaluate research, analyze policies, communicate effectively, and think critically about complex issues related to crime and justice. This study examines the levels of reading comprehension and the reading strategies used by Criminology students at a private college in Pagadian City during the 2024-2025 academic year.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: This study employs a descriptive quantitative research design involving 113 Criminology students from a higher education institution in Pagadian City during the 2024-2025 academic year. The first tool used is the Reading Comprehension Test developed by Yan (2011), consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions based on four passages. The second tool is the Reading Strategies Checklist, also created by Yan (2011), which helps participants in reading and answering questions, ranging from 1 to 30 items.</p> <p>Results: The researchers used the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate the relationship between reading strategies and reading comprehension among BS Criminology students. The results indicated that participants had poor reading comprehension, with an average score of 35.58%. In contrast, their reading strategies score was 1.77, categorized as "Good." Despite this, the analysis revealed no significant relationship between reading strategies and comprehension, as evidenced by a p-value of 0.903, which exceeds the conventional significance threshold of 0.05. Consequently, it can be concluded that reading strategies do not significantly impact reading comprehension in this group of students.</p> <p>Conclusion: Remedial and enrichment activities in English language literacy and incredibly dedicated reading time on Fridays are crucial for enhancing students' comprehension and preparing them for law enforcement careers. Teachers can support this by providing relevant reading materials and assigning reporting tasks. Future research should focus on qualitative studies that explore the experiences of Bachelor of Science in Criminology students. In-depth interviews can reveal the connections between their academic journeys and personal development, offering valuable insights into their lived experiences in the field.</p> Jay O. Dunggo-an ; Annielaine S. Gulam , Ryan Chris J. Pantilgan, Daisy Catubig Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1356 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0700