Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS
<p><strong>Journal of Education and Learning Reviews</strong></p> <p><strong>ISSN 3057-0387 (Online)</strong></p> <p><strong>Crossref Member name: Dr. Ken Institute of Academic Development and Promotion<br />DOI prefix (Crossref): 10.60027</strong></p> <p><a href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/3057-0387" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong><img src="https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/drkeninstitute/mceclip3.png" /></strong></a></p> <p><strong><a href="https://search.crossref.org/search/works?q=Journal+of+Education+and+Learning+Reviews+10.60027%2Fjelr.&from_ui=yes" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/drkeninstitute/mceclip2.png" width="288" height="86" /></a></strong></p> <p><strong><a href="https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AwrjJkSLuQ1nbQIAgj5XNyoA;_ylc=X1MDMjc2NjY3OQRfcgMyBGZyMgNzYi10b3AEZ3ByaWQDcGZSdHFYQ0hRdXluT0NZN1dpX0JtQQRuX3JzbHQDMARuX3N1Z2cDMARvcmlnaW4Dc2VhcmNoLnlhaG9vLmNvbQRwb3MDMARwcXN0cgMEcHFzdHJsAzAEcXN0cmwDMjIEcXVlcnkDUmVzZWFyY2hHYXRlJTIwMzA1Ny0wMzg3BHRfc3RtcAMxNzI4OTUyNzgz?p=ResearchGate+3057-0387&fr2=sb-top" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/drkeninstitute/blobid1.png" alt="ResearchGate - find and share research – Telegraph" /></a></strong></p> <p><strong><a href="https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=%22Journal%20of%20Education%20and%20Learning%20Reviews%22&sort=relevance" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/dr.keninstitute@gmail.com/blobid0-fb48de0b973f3100ad207b74b43067f8.png" alt="Semantic Scholar | Frequently Asked Questions" width="346" height="62" /></a></strong></p> <h1><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iq97FmQkaGOzJzXTsxJifq00vBXdIYxRK2zTn828KKM/edit#heading=h.tzb9xiqmpay7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ThaiJO User Manual</a> </h1> <h3> </h3> <p><strong>About Journal</strong></p> <p>Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is an open-access, international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal published by the DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion. It aims to promote excellence through the dissemination of high-quality research findings, specialist knowledge, and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of the Education and Learning field. Publications in the journal cover a broad range of topics related to education.</p> <p><strong>Publishing Policy - Aims and Scope</strong></p> <p>The Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, publishes research articles, academic articles, and/ or review articles. This journal covered in;</p> <p><strong>Education;</strong></p> <p>- Education Administration</p> <p>- <span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">Adult and Higher Education</span></p> <p>- Secondary and Higher Education</p> <p>- Special Education</p> <p>- Applied Linguistics or language education</p> <p>- Educational Theory</p> <p>- Education Research and Methodologies.</p> <p>- Research on Language Instruction</p> <p>- Educational Philosophies</p> <p>- STEM Education</p> <p>- Instructional Technology</p> <p>- Technology Education</p> <p>- Other Educational Fields</p> <p><strong>Learning;</strong></p> <p>- Teacher Preparation</p> <p>- Teaching and Learning,</p> <p>- Inquiry-based Learning</p> <p>- Project-based Learning,</p> <p>- Problem-based Learning</p> <p>- Simulation-based Learning,</p> <p>- Child Development</p> <p>- Curriculum</p> <p>- Reading Comprehension</p> <p>- Other Learning Fields</p> <p><strong>Type of Articles</strong></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">1. Research Article is a report of the results of a systematic study, research, or development.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">2. Academic Article is a work of writing an interesting topic in which the author presents new knowledge by using theories, concepts, and related research results as information sources.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">3. Review Article is an article that combines theories, concepts, and research results on many subjects, the author will synthesize the literature to compile it into a conclusion or argument on a particular matter, which is a review of the academic progress of that matter.</span></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Publication Frequency</strong></p> <p>Release scheduled of Six issues per year:</p> <ul> <li>Issue 1 January – February</li> <li>Issue 2 March – April</li> <li>Issue 3 May-June</li> <li>Issue 4 July-August</li> <li>Issue 5 September – October</li> <li>Issue 6 November– December</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Ownership and Management</strong></p> <p>DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion.<br />No. 139/26 Theenanon, Talad Sub-district, Mueang Mahasarakham District,<br />Mahasarakham Province, Thailand, 44000 Tel: +66817413978, or +66946398978.<br />Email: <a href="mailto:dr.keninstitute@gmail.com">dr.keninstitute@gmail.com</a><br />Facebook: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Dr.keninstitute">https://www.facebook.com/Dr.keninstitute</a></p>DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotionen-USJournal of Education and Learning Reviews3057-0387<p>Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.</p> <p><img src="https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/public/site/images/dr.keninstitute@gmail.com/mceclip0-8f90c14cdbab0a55c4f2ebf3386e1494.png" /></p>System of Linear Equations: A Comparative Study Between Cramer’s Rule and Paravartya’s Rule
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1303
<p>Background and Aims: Solving systems of linear equations is essential in mathematics education, influencing real-world problem-solving and advanced applications. This study compares the effectiveness of Cramer’s rule and Paravartya’s rule in enhancing Grade 8 students' achievement in linear equations, aiming to address challenges in teaching methods.</p> <p>Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design with a sequential exploratory design for qualitative data. Quantitative data were obtained through assessments, and qualitative data were collected from student feedback and analyzed thematically.</p> <p>Results: Findings revealed statistically significant improvements in students’ mathematics achievement from pretest to posttest using both methods (p < 0.05). Pretest scores were relatively low , but posttest scores showed notable improvements. Despite the absence of statistically significant differences in posttest outcomes between the two methods (p = 0.613), both approaches proved effective in enhancing problem-solving abilities. Key challenges identified included difficulties with signed numbers, large computations, equation transformation, and procedural steps. Students employed coping strategies such as memorization, chunking, consistent practice, and peer support. A Learning Activity Sheet (LAS) was developed to reinforce learning, promote active engagement, and accommodate diverse learning styles.</p> <p>Conclusion: The study concludes that both Cramer’s rule and Paravartya’s rule effectively enhance students' performance in solving systems of linear equations. Challenges related to procedural complexity were mitigated through structured interventions, peer collaboration, and practice. The findings highlight the need for targeted instructional strategies and the development of supportive resources, like LAS, to promote mathematical cognition and active learning. </p>Christian SaquinElmar Ancog
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-152312010.60027/jelr.2025.1303Leveraging Technology and Research to Shape Educational Policy
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1429
<p>Background and Aim: Research investigates how technology together with research affects policy formation in the educational domain at Department of Education Region IX. The research explores outcomes from planning officers together with senior education program specialists operating at eight Schools Division Offices (SDOs) and the Planning and Research Unit. This research investigates how technological instruments together with research programs create policy frameworks based on evidence and overcome management obstacles in education. The investigation studies these elements to explore knowledge transfer processes which lead to policy-making progress. In particular, the study aims to examine how educational stakeholders in DepEd Region IX utilize technology to inform and shape policies that address regional challenges and enhance educational outcomes. The study also analyzes the role of research in the formulation and implementation of educational policies, focusing on its impact on curriculum development, technology integration, and policy effectiveness. Lastly, it identifies the key barriers and opportunities in adopting technology-driven approaches to educational policymaking, with an emphasis on teacher development, digital literacy, and inclusive learning strategies.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: The research used qualitative investigation methods while thematic analysis allowed the evaluation of technology and research influences on educational policy development. The study obtained information from planning officers and senior education program specialists who work in both the Schools Division Offices and the Planning and Research Unit. Different methods of data collection were used to fully understand how policies get made which included both interviews and focus groups and document examination. Thematic analysis methods were used to detect regular patterns as well as main themes in the data regarding technology implementation together with evidence-based policy creation and organizational barriers.</p> <p>Results: Research shows technology has powerful positive impacts on making decisions through data while it optimizes policy development while making it easier to execute. Technology dramatically influences educational policy development through improved customization of instruction and wider student enrollment opportunities and advanced educational content development and trained instructor capabilities. Students can receive training that specifically caters to their needs, skills, and learning styles with the use of educational technology. Policymakers can create regulations that support differentiated education by using data analytics, AI-driven exams, and adaptive learning systems to gain insights into student performance. Several obstacles stand in the way of maximum technology use because they include insufficient technological foundations alongside minimal resources and poor digital aptitude across relevant groups. The research study uncovered four main aspects including digital tool integration through policy processes and capability enhancing programs as well as institutional blockages to technology research application and essential research frameworks needed for decision-making.</p> <p>Conclusion: Advanced technologies combined with research continue to affect multiple educational outcomes and the practices of teaching and professional development at DepEd Region IX. Modern educational technology allows personalized instruction and improves education accessibility for all students and enables analysis-based policy adjustments that guide curriculum transformation processes. Educational research acts as the main force which guides policy development and enables multidirectional collaboration between educational stakeholders to address regional problems and improve curriculum development. Through technology-based professional development programs educators have access to educational tools to combine teaching techniques and they share research information with peers through collaborative platforms. By improving technology teachers can acquire essential skills to manage changes in the educational environment which leads to an education system that promotes both inclusivity and competitiveness. This study holds significance because it provides foundational facts to policymakers who need knowledge regarding how technology supports balanced educational access. Stakeholders can develop educational policies through technology by combining barrier resolution with enabling factor maximization to meet the requirements of teachers and students. Research and technological integration should continue as critical components for developing sustainable educational progress so the Philippine education system maintains adaptation to global competition. </p>Jhonie Gumilao
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-1523213010.60027/jelr.2025.1429 Gamification in GENYO e-Learning: Exploring Student Motivation and Challenges in English Language Instruction
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1335
<p>Background and Aim: Gamification is widely recognized for enhancing student motivation. However, some educators sidestep it due to time constraints, insufficient technical skills, and challenges in selecting and integrating suitable games for teaching. Hence, this study explores the motivation and challenges in English language instruction.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: Using a qualitative, single-case study design, data were collected from eight (8) participants through semi-structured interviews and thoroughly analyzed using thematic analysis.</p> <p>Results: The findings reveal that students used Hangmoon, Memory Match, Crossword, and Triviatron in the GENYO e-learning platform, finding these games entertaining and educational. They appreciated the ease of access and how the games sparked their curiosity. Despite technical challenges, such as poor internet connectivity, malfunctioning IT equipment, forgotten login credentials, inaccessible links, and power outages, and complex game instructions, students adopted coping strategies, including adapting to technical difficulties, seeking support, and ensuring stable connectivity.</p> <p>Conclusion: The study concluded that a variety of games in the learning process enhances interactivity and engagement and sparks curiosity. Finally, this study underscored that gamification fosters a more dynamic and interactive classroom environment. </p>Mark William AranasJohn Mark SaysonAlfer Hope RamoAris Pet Angeli SuarezGenesis Naparan
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-1523314410.60027/jelr.2025.1335Foundations of Enhanced Problem-Solving Strategies (EPSS): Comprehension Skills and Influence on the Mathematics Performance of Students’ Grade 7 in the Philippines
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1712
<p><strong>Background and Aim:</strong> Poor reading comprehension is a key factor behind the declining mathematics performance among Filipino students, as effective problem-solving requires understanding concepts, relationships, and word problems in addition to numerical operations. At Liloy National High School, challenges in both comprehension and mathematics have prompted this study to examine how Grade 7 students' skills—remembering, understanding, applying, and analyzing—influence their mathematics performance. Ultimately, the study aims to develop Enhanced Problem-Solving Strategies (EPSS) to bridge comprehension gaps and improve academic outcomes.</p> <p><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> The study employed a descriptive-correlational design involving 127 Grade 7 students. A researcher-made questionnaire, validated by experts and pilot-tested for reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.710), was used to assess students’ mathematics comprehension levels. At the same time, their academic performance was measured using their mathematics grades. Data were analyzed using statistical tools such as means, frequency counts, and linear regression to elucidate the relationship between comprehension skills and mathematics performance.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Results indicated that female students generally demonstrated higher comprehension skills and better mathematics performance than their male counterparts. While females attained “satisfactory” ratings in remembering and understanding, males scored “fairly satisfactory” in these areas; both groups performed similarly in applying and analyzing, albeit at lower levels overall. Linear regression analysis confirmed that comprehension skills significantly influence mathematics performance, thus supporting the formulation of EPSS.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> In conclusion, the study demonstrates that improved comprehension, particularly higher-order cognitive skills, is associated with enhanced mathematics outcomes, providing a strong basis for adopting EPSS to elevate student performance.</p>Nelson Jr. RecanilGenecelle Quirante
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-1523455610.60027/jelr.2025.1712Modern Human Resource Management that Affects Academic Work Efficiency at Rajabhat University in Bangkok
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/949
<p>Background and Aim: Human Resource Management (HRM) is crucial for enhancing the efficiency of academic work in educational institutions. This study focuses on modern HRM practices at Rajabhat University in Bangkok, aiming to identify strategies that contribute to improved academic performance and operational effectiveness. The research specifically investigates teachers’ perceptions of HRM strategies and their impact on academic efficiency.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: The sample comprised 237 teachers at Rajabhat University during the 2024 academic year. A stratified random sampling method was employed to ensure a representative selection of participants. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, yielding a reliability value of 0.92. Data analysis included descriptive statistics (percentages, means, and standard deviations) and hypothesis testing using multiple regression analysis, conducted in a systematic, step-by-step manner.</p> <p>Results: Findings indicate that modern HRM practices are perceived positively by teachers, with discipline and maintaining order receiving the highest average ratings. Furthermore, the perceived efficiency of academic work was also rated highly, particularly in the area of learning process development. Hypothesis testing confirmed that modern HRM practices—specifically in areas such as attrition management, recruitment, personnel appointments, planning, and strategic positioning—significantly influence the efficiency of academic work at Rajabhat University, with a statistical significance level of 0.05.</p> <p>Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of modern HRM practices in enhancing academic work efficiency at Rajabhat University in Bangkok. The positive perceptions of teachers regarding HRM strategies highlight the necessity for continued investment in human resource development to further elevate academic performance and foster organizational success. </p>Ntapat WorapongpatPornjit ArunyakanonWichan Rianwilairat
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-1523577210.60027/jelr.2025.949The 4 Mode Application Techniques Learning Model in Science Education: Analysis of Global Trends, Impacts, and Opportunities in Indonesia
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1528
<p>Background and Aim: The limited research and literature on implementing the 4 Mode Application Techniques (4MAT) instructional model in Indonesia makes it challenging for educators to obtain sufficient information on how to adapt this model within the local context. This study analyzes global trends, challenges, and opportunities of the 4MAT instructional model in science education within the Merdeka Curriculum framework.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: The research employs a mixed-method approach, incorporating quantitative bibliometric analysis and qualitative systematic literature review using the PICOA framework. Data were collected from the Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Lens, and Google Scholar databases from 2014 to 2024. </p> <p>Results: The findings indicate that the 4MAT instructional model encompasses five key concepts: instructional method implementation, learning models, learning styles, conceptual understanding, and teaching strategies. The 4MAT instructional model impacts mathematics and science education, which the Merdeka Curriculum can support through various aspects, including diverse learning styles and cognitive skills, cognitive approaches and memory reinforcement, student motivation and engagement, enhancement of critical thinking and creativity, collaboration and social skills, real-world relevance and sustainability, and a well-structured learning framework. Challenges in implementing the 4MAT instructional model include intensive teacher training, limited resources and infrastructure, time constraints and implementation complexity, student readiness and learning style diversity, complex assessment and evaluation processes, curriculum alignment, and topic limitations. However, the Merdeka Curriculum presents opportunities through continuous professional development, utilizing creative resources, flexibility in instructional planning, and adapting more inclusive and differentiated teaching strategies. </p> <p>Conclusion: In conclusion, the 4MAT instructional model offers a thorough approach to improving math and science instruction that supports the Merdeka Curriculum. Despite implementation issues, its integration can support inclusive, engaging, and fruitful learning experiences when combined with professional development and adaptable strategies.</p>Thoriqi FirdausInsih WilujengLaifa RahmawatiSabar NurohmanNi'matul Zahro
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-1523739410.60027/jelr.2025.1528Building Collaboration Between Schools and Communities: A Case Study of Multiple Schools in Luoyang District
https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JELS/article/view/1097
<p>Background and Aim: In recent years, China has shifted from a traditional "unit system" to a "community system," which has impacted the role of primary and secondary schools within local communities. This transformation, combined with the rising emphasis on lifelong learning, necessitates stronger collaboration between schools and communities. However, limited research and planning currently guide school-community partnerships in China, particularly in Luoyang District. This study examines the current status of collaboration, identifies key challenges, and proposes strategies to enhance school-community relationships.</p> <p>Materials and Methods: The study was conducted with a sample of school administrators and teachers from primary and secondary schools in Luoyang, Henan Province, China, alongside community representatives. Purposive sampling was used to select 30 administrators and 100 teachers, ensuring participants had relevant experience in school-community partnerships. Data collection included surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions with school and community stakeholders. Qualitative data analysis was conducted to identify recurring themes and insights.</p> <p>Results: Findings reveal that while some schools have established partnerships with local organizations, collaboration levels vary widely. Key challenges identified include communication barriers, resource limitations, and cultural differences between schools and communities. Schools often lack systematic approaches for partnership, leading to inconsistent engagement across institutions.</p> <p>Conclusion: his study underscores the critical role of regular communication, resource sharing, and targeted community engagement programs in fostering effective school-community collaboration. By emphasizing the interconnectedness between educational institutions and their surrounding communities, the findings highlight the necessity of creating structured forums for ongoing dialogue, which can facilitate mutual understanding and shared objectives. Moreover, strategic resource sharing, such as infrastructure, knowledge, and expertise, can optimize the benefits for both schools and communities. Targeted professional development for educators, focusing on community engagement strategies and culturally responsive practices, is also essential to equip them with the skills necessary to build and maintain these partnerships. These initiatives can further empower schools to act as community hubs, enhancing their capacity to address local needs and contribute to social cohesion. For policymakers and educational leaders in China, the insights from this study provide a framework for designing policies that promote sustainable collaboration. This includes incentivizing partnerships, providing funding for community-based programs, and incorporating collaboration metrics into school evaluation systems. Future research could explore the long-term impact of these initiatives on student outcomes, community well-being, and educational equity, ultimately strengthening the bond between schools and their communities.</p>Ntapat Worapongpat
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Learning Reviews
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2025-04-152025-04-15239510410.60027/jelr.2025.1097