Patterns of Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Secondary Students in Research-Oriented Learning Contexts
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies is essential for teachers as it helps them understand how students plan, monitor, and evaluate their reading. This awareness informs targeted instruction, strategy modeling, and scaffolding for complex texts, supporting deeper comprehension and research literacy. While prior research has extensively examined these strategies among university students in EFL contexts, limited attention has been given to how secondary students apply metacognitive strategies when reading scholarly texts in research-oriented instruction. Addressing this gap, the present study examines the levels and differences in global, problem-solving, and support reading strategies among secondary students enrolled in a research course.
Materials and Methods: A quantitative descriptive design was employed to assess students’ metacognitive reading strategies. The sample consisted of 350 students from a secondary institution in Baguio City, Philippines, selected using cluster sampling. The adapted Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) was used to measure global, problem-solving, and support strategies. Data were collected via a questionnaire administered online with informed consent. Descriptive statistics and Huynh–Feldt–corrected repeated-measures ANOVA were used to analyze strategy levels and differences.
Results: The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in the extent to which students employed the three types of metacognitive reading strategies. The analysis indicated that students did not use all strategies equally, but rather demonstrated a distinct hierarchical pattern. Post hoc comparisons showed that problem-solving strategies were used significantly more frequently than global strategies, while global strategies were used significantly more than support strategies (problem-solving > global > support). This pattern highlights that when engaging with scholarly texts, students tend to prioritize immediate comprehension and problem-solving tactics over broader evaluative strategies and supportive practices like note-taking or consulting references, which may impede comprehensive understanding of scholarly texts.
Conclusion: Students actively employ metacognitive strategies when reading scholarly texts, with problem-solving strategies dominant, global strategies moderate, and support strategies least used. The study proposes the Global–Problem-Solving–Support (G–P–S) model as a framework for understanding the interdependence of the different metacognitive strategies for effective reading of scholarly texts. Findings highlight the need for explicit instruction to strengthen global and support strategies. Teachers may design guided research-reading activities, to support students in purpose-setting, monitoring comprehension, and synthesizing information, thereby promoting a more balanced use of global, problem-solving, and support reading strategies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Abu-Snoubar, T. K. (2017). English as a foreign language learners’ major and metacognitive reading strategy use at Al-Balqa Applied University. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p69
Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2018). EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11220a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11220a
Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mante-Estacio, M. J. (2023). Metacognitive reading strategies and its relationship with Filipino high school students’ reading proficiency: Insights from the PISA 2018 data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 400. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01886-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01886-6
Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Evaluating the predictive power of metacognitive reading strategies across diverse educational contexts. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00240-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00240-3
Hong-Nam, K. (2014). ELL high school students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use and reading proficiency. TESL-EJ, 18(1), 1–23.
Khoshsima, H., & Samani, E. (2015). The most frequent metacognitive strategies used in reading comprehension among ESP learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.180
Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, M. (2015). The relationship between metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, reading attitude, and reading motivation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 811–818.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249
Popandopulo, A., Kudysheva, A., Fominykh, N., Nurgaliyeva, M., & Kudarova, N. (2023). Assessment of students’ metacognitive skills in the context of Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1182377. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1182377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1182377
Sheikh, I., Soomro, K. A., & Hussain, N. (2019). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, reading practices, and academic attainments of university students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 126–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i1.2749
Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164
