Generative AI Adoption and Governance in African Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of Ghanaian Universities

Main Article Content

Silas Adjei
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3457-9325
Isaac Nii Noi Nortey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0424-2237
Samuel Babbington Norteye
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6276-7302
Isaac Kojo Agyeman
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-1111

Abstract

Background and Aim: The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education offers transformative opportunities while creating substantial governance challenges, particularly in resource-constrained Global South settings. This study examined GenAI adoption, perceptions, and governance frameworks across Ghanaian higher education institutions, addressing limited empirical evidence concerning AI governance in Africa.


Materials and Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. Structured surveys collected quantitative data from 1,235 students and 247 academic staff across 12 public and private Ghanaian universities. Semi-structured interviews with 28 administrators, policymakers, and academics generated qualitative evidence. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model and institutional theory, the study applied descriptive statistics, inferential tests, and thematic analysis.


Results: Regular GenAI use was reported by 67.3% of students and 54.3% of academic staff using ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot. Perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly predicted behavioural intention, explaining 58% of its variance. Nevertheless, no participating Ghanaian university had a formal, publicly accessible AI policy, resulting in inconsistent assessment practices and concerns regarding fairness, transparency, and accountability. Five governance challenges emerged: inadequate policy readiness, disparities in digital literacy, infrastructure limitations, ethical and academic-integrity risks, and cultural relevance concerns.


Conclusion: The study proposes a context-sensitive governance framework encompassing eight dimensions: academic integrity; ethical and responsible use; privacy and security; equitable access; GenAI literacy; integration strategy; human oversight and accountability; and institutional infrastructure. It provides evidence from an under-researched African context and practical guidance for policymakers, university administrators, and educational technologists pursuing responsible, equitable, and contextually appropriate GenAI integration.

Article Details

How to Cite
Adjei, S., Nii Noi Nortey, I., Babbington Norteye, S., & Kojo Agyeman, I. (2026). Generative AI Adoption and Governance in African Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of Ghanaian Universities. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 3(5), e3787 . https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2026.e3787
Section
Articles

References

Adarkwah, M. A. (2025). GenAI-infused adult learning in the digital era: A conceptual framework for higher education. Adult Learning, 36(3), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595241271161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595241271161

Adjei, S., Norteye, S. B., Nortey, I. N. N., Agyeman, I. K., & Joseph, L. A. M. (2026). Generative AI changing Ghanaian universities: New challenges for information experts. AI & Cyber Forum: An International Journal, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.51470/AI.2026.5.1.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51470/AI.2026.5.1.18

Albakri, M. (2026). A systems thinking framework for the integration of generative artificial intelligence in decolonising higher education. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70057

Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088

Amouzou, K.-E. (2024). A study of the development of North Ghana Mission of the Seventh-day Adventist Church (1950–2023) [Master’s thesis, Adventist University of Africa]. AUA iRepository. https://irepository.aua.ac.ke/items/8b1d4807-86de-44ae-8643-c54ec6e1d538

Aryeh-Adjei, A. A., Kayi, E. A., Adu, K. K., & Mensah Danquah, M. (2026). Generative AI and experiential learning: Toward a socially sustainable model of doctoral education in Ghana. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2025-0596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2025-0596

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Crompton, H., Burke, D., Nickel, C., Bozkurt, A., Miao, F., Sharples, M., Greene, J. A., Parsons, D., Gill-Simmen, L., Edmett, A., Pegrum, M., de Waard, I., Bonk, C. J., Garcia, M. B., Curry, J. H., Lindsey, L. A., Yang, M., Marshall, S., Bali, M., . . . Yu, S. (2026). Governing generative AI in higher education: A global Delphi study on policy and practice. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00602-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00602-z

Cudjoe, E. K., & Adebayo, J. O. (2025). Investigating the existence of AI policy in higher education institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1414–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1421

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006

Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

HolonIQ. (2023, February 27). Artificial intelligence in education: 2023 survey insights. https://www.holoniq.com/notes/artificial-intelligence-in-education-2023-survey-insights

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology[KNUST]. (2026, July 15). KNUST opens 2026 E-Learning Awareness Week with call for ethical, inclusive AI-driven education. https://www.knust.edu.gh/news/news-items/knust-opens-2026-e-learning-awareness-week-call-ethical-inclusive-ai-driven-education

McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Hingle Collier, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, Article 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121

Mudenda, S., Mukosha, M., Mfune, R. L., Kathewera, B., Mutanekelwa, I., Mwanza, B., Mufwambi, W., Hampango, M., Kamvuma, K., Mwaba, M., Muyenga, T., Chileshe, C., Zulu, M., Tembo, R., Mwaba, F., Kafwimbi, S., Lubanga, A. F., Simweene, C. C., Mohamed, S., . . . Godman, B. (2026). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in African higher education: University students’ awareness, attitudes, and use of ChatGPT in Zambia. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1814033. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1814033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1814033

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). Decolonization, development and knowledge in Africa: Turning over a new leaf. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030423

Nwaigwe, H. C., Ayanwale, M. A., Ukeje, I. O., Aja, N. I., Ekwunife, R. A., Atukpa, E. I., Nwigwe, C. N., & Egba, V. N. (2026). Digital transformation and public value creation in higher education: A PRISMA-ScR review and evidence-synthesized framework of digital competencies, institutional readiness, and governance pathways. Sustainability, 18(10), Article 5125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105125

Ozguven, M., Kaya, S., & Yilmaz, E. (2025). Cultural perspectives on authorship in African higher education. Journal of African Education, 16(2), 45–67.

Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07

Roussos, G., Agorogianni, A., Salmatzidis, I., Tsiatsos, T., Maltush, P., Renders, E., Koscielniak, T., Vogl, R., Nejdl, W., Anagnostopoulos, C.-N., López Nores, M., Ferrell, G., & O’Brien, J. (2025). It’s a global issue: AI, digital transformation, and governance. In Proceedings of the EUNIS 2025 Annual Congress (EPiC Series in Computing, Vol. 107, pp. 21–39). EasyChair. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED676900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29007/88b5

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?id=kWb-AAAAQBAJ

Shamsi, I. R. (2024). Empowering higher education through digital transformation and strategic planning for academic advancement. Emerging Science Journal, 8(Special issue), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-SIED1-019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-SIED1-019

Thaldar, D., Botes, M., Badru, A., Chenia, H., Duma, S., Dlamini, S. B., Amin, N., Hugo, W., Govender, R., Bruce-Brand, J., Vosloo, A., Koorbanally, N. A., & Chuturgoon, A. (2025). Generative AI governance in higher education: A case study from Africa. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, Article 1666661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1666661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1666661

Van Noorden, R., & Perkel, J. M. (2023). AI and science: What 1,600 researchers think. Nature, 621(7980), 672–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02980-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02980-0

Yamson, G. C., Asimah, A. P. A., Agyei, D. D., Sanche, S., & Shibambu, A. B. (2026). Shifting the dynamics: Analysis of the impact of generative AIs on the use of e-resources in universities in Ghana. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 16(2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2026.16.2.079

Yarboi-Tetteh, D. O. (2026, March 4). Ghana: UCC to establish AI-powered digital eCampus ecosystem. Ghanaian Times. https://allafrica.com/stories/202603050731.html