Leadership Anxiety Among Newly Appointed School Principals: The Role of Administrative Pressure and Policy Expectations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Newly appointed school principals often encounter significant challenges as they transition into leadership roles. Beyond occupational stress, leadership anxiety has emerged as a distinct psychological phenomenon characterized by concerns about leadership competence, decision-making, and accountability. However, limited qualitative research has explored how administrative pressure and policy expectations contribute to leadership anxiety, particularly in remote and under-resourced educational contexts. This study aimed to examine the experiences of newly appointed principals in District Kech, Balochistan, focusing on the influence of administrative pressure and policy expectations on leadership anxiety.
Methodology: A qualitative phenomenological design was employed to capture participants' lived experiences. Twelve newly appointed government school principals with between 0.3 and 2.8 years of leadership experience were selected through purposive criterion sampling. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis approach. Trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, peer debriefing, reflexive journaling, and thick description.
Results: Four major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Sinking in Files and Fear, reflecting the pervasive nature of leadership anxiety; (2) Chasing the Paper Across the District, highlighting administrative burdens associated with reporting requirements, travel demands, and monitoring processes; (3) Orders That Arrive but Never Explain, illustrating the anxiety generated by unclear and frequently changing policy expectations; and (4) Alone Between the Mountains and the Sea, demonstrating how geographical isolation intensified both administrative and policy-related pressures. The findings revealed that policy ambiguity, rather than policy volume or complexity, was the most significant contributor to leadership anxiety. Limited access to guidance, delayed feedback, and inadequate institutional support further amplified principals’ feelings of uncertainty and vulnerability.
Conclusion: Leadership anxiety among newly appointed principals in District Kech is shaped by a combination of administrative overload, policy ambiguity, and geographical isolation. The findings underscore the need for structured induction programs, mentoring systems, clearer policy communication, and context-sensitive support mechanisms to strengthen leadership capacity and improve principal well-being in remote educational settings.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
Copyright of all articles published in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is retained by the author(s).
All articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Users may read, download, copy, distribute, and share the content for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Modification, adaptation, or commercial use of the content is not permitted.
License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
References
Balochistan Education Project. (n.d.). Making use of WhatsApp at GPE-BEP. Government of Balochistan. https://pmused.gob.pk
Bartanen, B., Grissom, J. A., & Rogers, L. K. (2019). The impacts of principal turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719855044
Bastian, K. C., & Henry, G. T. (2022). Principal anxiety and turnover intentions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(3), 412–445.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DeMatthews, D., Carrola, P., Reyes, P., & Knight, D. (2021). School leadership burnout and job-related stress: Recommendations for district administrators and principals. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 94(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2021.1894083
Grissom, J. A., & Mitani, H. (2020). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/how-principals-affect-students-and-schools.aspx
Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/How-Principals-Affect-Students-and-Schools.pdf
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Herman, K. C., Reinke, W. M., & Thompson, A. M. (2020). Principal stress and coping. School Psychology Review, 49(4), 385–399.
Hitt, D. H., Meyers, C. V., & Woodruff, D. (2022). Principal preparation program effectiveness. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 17(1), 3–28.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. John Wiley & Sons.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Khanal, J., & Ghimire, S. (2024). Understanding the role conflict and role ambiguity of school principals in Nepal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(2), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211073410
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mahfouz, J. (2020). Principal stress and well-being. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 527–544.
Mahfouz, J., Greenberg, M. T., & Rodriguez, A. (2020). Principal self-care and resilience. School Leadership Review, 15(1), 45–62.
Majumdar, K., & Baikady, R. (2024). Rural development research: Definitional fragmentation and representational imbalances. In K. Majumdar & R. Baikady (Eds.), Rural development in the 21st century: Challenges and pathways (pp. 45–68). Springer.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O’Donnell, R. J., Kirkland, D. E., & Giraldo-García, R. (2021). Principal preparation for equity. Journal of School Leadership, 31(4), 291–314.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
Resnik, D. B. (2020). What is ethics in research, and why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis
Schmidt, S., Roesler, U., Kusserow, T., & Rau, R. (2014). Uncertainty in the workplace: Examining role ambiguity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035622
Spillane, J. P. (2018). Policy implementation and school leadership. Harvard Education Press.
Spillane, J. P., & Lee, L. C. (2019). Novice principal sensemaking: Understanding the challenges of leading schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(5), 683–701.
van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315422657
Wang, F., & Pollock, K. (2019). Principal stress and burnout: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(5), 1001–1015.
Wang, F., Pollock, K., & Hauseman, C. (2022). Principal workload and well-being: Implications for leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(2), 234–252.
