Balancing Face-Saving and Clarity in Written Teacher Feedback: A Systematic Review in Philippine Higher Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Written teacher feedback serves not only as corrective instruction but also as socio-pragmatic communication that influences student motivation, interpretation, and engagement. In Philippine higher education, politeness strategies shape how students receive and act on feedback; however, existing studies remain fragmented. This study synthesized literature on politeness strategies in written teacher feedback and examined their pragmatic and pedagogical implications.
Materials and Methods: A systematic thematic literature review was conducted using 50 empirical and theoretical studies. Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory served as the analytic framework. Studies were identified through structured database searches, citation chaining, relevance screening, and quality appraisal. The selected literature was coded according to politeness strategies, pragmatic functions, student engagement outcomes, teacher–student perception alignment, and contextual influences.
Results: The review revealed that positive and negative politeness strategies were the most frequently reported forms of written teacher feedback. These strategies helped preserve rapport, reduce writing anxiety, manage face-threatening acts, and encourage revision engagement. However, excessive hedging and indirectness sometimes reduced feedback clarity and created interpretive ambiguity. A recurring mismatch between teacher intentions and student perceptions was also identified, particularly when polite feedback lacked explicit and actionable guidance. Cultural norms, teacher authority, feedback literacy, and pragmatic awareness strongly influenced how feedback was delivered and interpreted.
Conclusion: Effective written teacher feedback requires a balanced integration of relational sensitivity and instructional clarity. Politeness strategies can strengthen motivation and engagement when they are context-sensitive, explicit, and pedagogically purposeful. Teacher education and higher education institutions should strengthen feedback literacy, pragmatic awareness, and dialogic feedback practices to improve student engagement, revision uptake, and writing outcomes. This review contributes to Philippine higher education by positioning written feedback as a dual pedagogical and socio-pragmatic practice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
Copyright of all articles published in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews (JELR) is retained by the author(s).
All articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Users may read, download, copy, distribute, and share the content for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Modification, adaptation, or commercial use of the content is not permitted.
License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
References
Arrosyidah, H. J., Munir, A., & Mustofa, A. (2024). A comprehensive exploration of lecturers’ written corrective feedback on students’ counterargument paragraphs in enhancing argumentative writing proficiency. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 5(3), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i3.593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i3.593
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Eslit, E. R. (2025). English language teaching (ELT) best practices: A post-pandemic language teaching analysis [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202503.0597.v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202503.0597.v1
Febriansyah, R. (2018). Teachers’ politeness strategies in giving feedback on thesis proposal presentations of English teacher education students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 3(2), 123–134.
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2023). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and ways forward. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221150811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221150811
Nurmukhamedov, U., & Kim, S. H. (2010). “Would you perhaps consider…?” Hedged comments in ESL writing. ELT Journal, 64(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp063
Park, J., & Ahn, S. Y. (2022). L2 learners’ cognitive and behavioral engagement with written corrective feedback. English Teaching, 77(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.3.202209.133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.3.202209.133
Putri, F. A., & Pratama, I. D. (2023). How did the teachers talk? Investigating politeness strategies in teachers’ utterances during classroom interactions in the English subject. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Studi Amerika, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/jbssa.v29i2.80099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jbssa.v29i2.80099
Qiongyan, Z., & Simin, C. (2021). On positive politeness strategies of teacher talk in English classroom teaching for non-English major undergraduates. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.041001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.041001
Rahim, S. A., Alim, A., Cui, Q., & Yang, X. (2024). The feedback dilemma: Aligning L2 writing instruction with student preferences. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(12), e003138. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i12.3138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i12.3138
Razali, R., & Jupri, R. (2014). Exploring teacher-written feedback and student revisions on ESL students’ writing. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(5), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19556370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19556370
Ryoo, S. M. (2023). Efficacy of hedges in formative feedback on L2 writing. International Journal on Studies in Education, 5(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.171
Saide, T. E., & Rosa, R. M. D. (2025). Student feedback, teaching effectiveness, and student learning outcomes at UPHSL Jonelta Campus. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(2), 1614–1623. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijmrge.2025.6.2.1614-1623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.2.1614-1623
Sanchez, H. S., & Rodrigues, L. D. A. D. (2024). Pedagogical intentions behind teacher-written feedback: Perspectives and practices of an English language teacher educator in Argentina. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4347120
Sumabat, A. A., & Martinez, D. M. A. (2025). Unveiling pedagogical insights: Investigating English teachers’ written corrective feedback strategies. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v10i2.6143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v10i2.6143
Syting, C. J. O., & Gildore, P. J. E. (2022). Teachers’ linguistic politeness in classroom interaction: A pragmatic analysis. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p133
Tabari, M. A., Sato, M., & Wang, Y. (2023). Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231202574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231202574
Wahyudi, A., Sari, F., Amaliah, A., Pamuji, A., & Dharmawan, Y. Y. (2024). From critique to insight: Student voices on English writing feedback. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25659
Waluyo, B., & Apridayani, A. (2024). Better learning and practice with teacher corrective feedback in higher education: A lesson from Thailand. Learning: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2024.2357552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2024.2357552
Yanuar, I. D. (2022). “I enjoy writing in English”: Effect of using politeness in written direct feedback. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 7(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v7i1.10461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v7i1.10461
