Why Teachers Leave: A Phenomenological Inquiry into School Climate and Educator Attrition in Misamis Occidental
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: The problem of teacher attrition is one of the burning issues in the Philippines, and Misamis Occidental is no exception, as quite a lot of teachers are leaving their jobs due to poor school environments, overworking, and a lack of administrative assistance. This research was anchored on both the Organizational Climate Theory and Self-Determination Theory and was aimed at establishing the impact of school climate on the motivation and commitment of teachers, as well as the ultimate decision to abandon the teaching career.
Materials and Methods: Researchers used a qualitative phenomenological design (Moustakas, 1994) to obtain the lived experiences of eight former teachers who had worked in both public and private institutions in Misamis Occidental. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants, according to their previous teaching experience, and their willful exit from the profession. Information was gathered by comprehensive semi-structured interviews with a depth approach and analyzed following the transcendental phenomenological method by Moustakas, which included epoche, horizontalization, and imaginative variation to establish the essence and the structure of the experiences of the people who participated in the interviews.
Results: Thematic analysis demonstrated that there were five themes that were interrelated and helped understand the complex factors leading to teacher attrition. (1) There was a strong mention of personal and professional stressors, and the participants mentioned heavy workloads, burnout, and deterioration of health, which were common causes of emotional depletion. (2) Some of the coping mechanisms were determined as a result of different adaptive responses, including self-reflection, emotional regulation, peer collaboration, and self-care practices. (3) Career satisfaction and fulfillment were tied closely but tend to conflict with each other, where teachers felt the purpose and the success of their work was mainly based on the progress of the students, their freedom in teaching, and their work recognition. (4) Support and administrative leadership were not seen as adequate, and the participants did not feel satisfied with the irregular guidance, lack of recognition, and professional development opportunities. (5) Despite the systemic challenge, professional identity and moral commitment were still apparent since even when some of the participants had chosen to abandon the teaching profession, they still maintained their vocation and moral commitment.
Conclusion: The results focus on the fact that psychological and institutional aspects are important contributors to teacher attrition. The retention and professional well-being can be promoted through a positive and supportive school climate that is marked by understanding leadership, fair workload, and acknowledgement of the contribution made by teachers. On the other hand, unfavorable working conditions and poor management service increase turnover. This study highlights the pressing need for responsive school management practices and all-inclusive teacher support systems that foster motivation, enhance professional identity, and maintain a dedicated and robust teaching force.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Alegado, P. (2018). Leadership challenges in Philippine schools: Implications for teacher motivation and retention. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 93(2), 45–59.
Anog, M. D. I., de Vera, J. V., & Peteros, E. D. L. (2024). Examining teacher retention through the lens of job satisfaction and commitment in a Philippine private school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.13
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788
Chadwick, K., Chadwick, J., & Rogers, E. (2010). Compensation, benefits, and teacher retention: Lessons from developing nations. International Education Review, 56(1), 89–104.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Dela Cruz, J. R., Santos, K. P., & Marasigan, R. L. (2025). Administrative leadership and teacher retention in Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership, 8(1), 22–41.
Ertürk, R. (2022). The relationship between school administrators’ empowering leadership behaviors and teachers’ perceptions of organizational citizenship. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 6(1), 1–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1352894.pdf
Exploring key factors affecting private school teachers’ retention in select private schools in Pampanga. (2025). International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 6(11). https://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/6/IJAMR250611.pdf
Gallego, M. K. F. (2023). School climate and burnout among mathematics teachers as a basis for teacher empowerment action plan: A convergent parallel design. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v3i4.2849
Gamboa, M. (2022). Collegial collaboration and teacher satisfaction: Strengthening bayanihan in Philippine schools. Journal of Educational Development Research, 12(4), 77–95.
Godoy, M. L. E., & Garcia Jr., A. L. (2023). School organizational climate of public elementary schools in Bulan District. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 7(3), 98–116. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/H2270398116.pdf
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499
Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Harvard University Press.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD education policy outlook 2019: Working together to help students achieve their potential. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2b8ad56e-en
Perfecto, E. (2012). Teacher autonomy and professional satisfaction: A Philippine perspective. The Educator’s Journal, 3(2), 88–102.
Prudente, M., Resurreccion, J., & De Luna, E. (2024). Professional development and teacher motivation in public basic education. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 55–74.
Ramirez, H. J. C., & Capili, J. T. (2024). Leadership style of school heads and its influence on teacher retention: Basis for a teacher retention plan. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v10i1.151
Rudasill, K. M., Snyder, K. E., Lea, S. E., & White, J. M. (2018). School climate and teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.001
Salipot, E. M. V., & Quintana, M. L. F. (2024). Lived experiences of teachers who have undergone attrition in the new normal at a private school. IARI Conference Article, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.53378/iarr.924.128
Tarraya, M. L. (2022). Excessive workload and burnout among Filipino teachers: Policy implications for retention. Philippine Journal of Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 34–52.
Usma, J. (2016). Teacher autonomy and agency: Empowering educators in centralized systems. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 31(2), 203–221.
Vaidya, S. R., & Hanna, C. (2023). The four-capital theory as a framework for teacher retention and attrition. International Education Studies, 16(6), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n6p21
Zuasola, J., & Zalsos, C. (2024). Student behavior and classroom climate as predictors of teacher burnout. Philippine Educational Review, 18(1), 66–83.