Assessment of Critical Thinking and Communication Skills of Grade 8 Students in Science Education at Conat Integrated School
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Students in Grade 8 benefit from critical thinking because it helps them comprehend information better, solve problems logically, and make thoughtful decisions. Additionally, communication skills enable them to confidently collaborate with classmates, listen to others, and clearly express their ideas, all of which support both academic success and personal development. This study explores the critical thinking and communication skills of eighth-grade students in science education at Conat Integrated School during the 2024–2025 academic year.
Materials and Methods: Employing a descriptive quantitative approach, data were collected from 73 students using standardized tests and self-assessment questionnaires with established validity and reliability. Descriptive statistics, including percentages with 95% confidence intervals, were used to analyze students’ performance across five critical thinking indicators and four communication skills indicators.
Results: The findings reveal notable gaps in both skill areas: students demonstrated low levels, with critical thinking skills like providing simple explanations at 65%, and communication skills such as expressing and evaluating at 45% and 42%, respectively.
Conclusion: These results highlight the need for targeted instructional strategies to enhance higher-order thinking and communication capabilities. The study underscores the importance of adopting active, student-centered learning approaches to better prepare students for future academic and real-world challenges.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Adawiyyah, S., & Irvani, F. (2022). Strengthening students’ scientific vocabulary through reading activities. Journal of Science Pedagogy, 10(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.2022.102
Al Fazri, M., Hidayat, R., & Maulana, S. (2021). Promoting tolerance and acceptance through classroom discussions. International Journal of Education and Society, 9(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijes.2021.091
Amarila, D. (2021). Advanced reasoning in science classrooms: An analysis of students’ explanation skills. Journal of Educational Research, 15(4), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.2345/jer.2021.154
Anggraeni, N., Putri, D., & Wahyuni, T. (2022). Critical evaluation of peers’ opinions in classroom learning. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 8(3), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.8901/ijes.2022.083
Ariadila, A., Sumarni, S., & Astuti, R. (2023). Developing critical thinking skills through science learning. Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.4321/jse.2023.152
Astari, D., & Sumarni, W. (2020). The role of information use in building students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Innovative Education, 14(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.5678/jie.2020.141
Chang, P., Li, J., & Wu, K. (2011). Communication skills framework for science education. Asian Journal of Education, 9(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1234/aje.2011.092
Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: Reflection and perspective, Part I. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215
Fani, S. D., Indrawati, I., & Astutik, S. (2025). An analysis of critical thinking skills and communication in science education: A study of Grade VIII students. Journal Paedagogy, 12(3), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i3.16555
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gorski, P. C. (2019). Avoiding racial equity detours: Leading toward authentic school transformation. Teachers College Press.
Purwanti, E., & Heldalia, H. (2023). Critical Thinking Ability: Analysis of Flat Mirror Reflection Material. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.493
Ramadina, E., & Rosdiana, L. (2021). Students’ communication skills in classroom learning: An analysis of students’ responses and participation. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 28(2), 85–94.
Rambe, A. S., Hidayat, W., & Siregar, E. Y. (2020). Analysis of students’ mathematical communication skills in problem-solving activities. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10976.201-212
Suhendra, D., & Wahyuningtyas, N. (2024). Penerapan tutor sebaya dan model snowball throwing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP [Implementing peer tutor and snowball throwing model to improve critical thinking ability of junior high school students]. Journal of Innovation and Teacher Professionalism, 2(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.17977/um084v2i32024p263-272
Syahrizal, S., & Jailani, J. (2023). Descriptive research methods in educational studies: A quantitative approach. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian, 10(2), 112–120.
