Blended Learning: A Disruptive Innovation" by Tony Bates, which Explores the Impact and Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Educational Settings

Sunan Siphai; Suphi Siphai

doi:10.60027/jelr.2024.772

Authors

Sunan Siphai Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6847-1103
Suphi Siphai Deputy Director of Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area 4, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1000-8789

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.772

Keywords:

Blended Learning,, Innovation, , Impact, , Effectiveness, , Educational Settings

Abstract

Background and Aims: The impact and effectiveness of blended learning are critical because they show how combining online and in-person instruction can improve student engagement, academic performance, and flexibility. This approach provides a comprehensive educational experience that adapts to a variety of learning needs and environments, ultimately improving overall educational outcomes. The study's goal was to investigate how blended learning disrupts traditional education models and what benefits it may offer.

Methodology: Bates' research integrates academic literature, case studies, and empirical data to assess the impact of blended learning, with surveys, interviews, and case study protocols used to collect comprehensive data. The analysis brings these findings together to reveal key themes and gaps, providing a thorough understanding of blended learning's effectiveness and implementation.

Results: The finding found that Blended learning has been shown to improve student engagement, academic performance, and flexibility through successful implementations at institutions such as the University of Central Florida and Georgia State University. Addressing technical and pedagogical challenges, as well as incorporating emerging technologies, is critical for reaping the benefits. Continued research and support systems will be critical for optimizing blended learning and meeting the changing needs of students and teachers.

Conclusion: Blended learning improves student engagement, performance, and flexibility, as demonstrated by successful models at UCF and Georgia State University. To fully realize its potential, it must address technical and pedagogical challenges while also embracing emerging technologies, with ongoing research and strong support systems critical to future success.

References

Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. W. W. Norton & Company.

Bates, T. (2019). Blended learning: A disruptive innovation. In Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (pp. 1-20). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2019/09/16/blended-learning-a-disruptive-innovation/

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R., & Almasi, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(2), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9020-8

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. https://www.educause.edu/ecar

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and a case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass.

Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2013). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When, and How. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095959

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Online education: Foundations, planning, and pedagogy. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226750

Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Education, 1(1), 1-4. https://hippasus.com/resources/2006/TransformationTechnologyAndEducation/

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952

This methodology ensures a comprehensive examination of blended learning, combining theoretical, empirical, and practical perspectives to evaluate its impact and effectiveness.

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001

Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann.