A Course Evaluation of Foundations of Language and Linguistics: B. Ed. Four-Year Course (CIPP Model)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aims: The main goal of this study was to evaluate the course titled Foundations of Language and Linguistics in the Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) Four-year program at Tribhuvan University using the (CIPP) Context, Input, Process, and Product model approach. The purpose of using the CIPP model is to assess delivery, relevance, and learning outcomes.
Methodology: This study employs a small qualitative design employing semi-structured interviews with two university professors and two B.Ed. Graduates to gain insights.
Results: Findings revealed limited practical application, outdated curriculum, contextual phenomena, minimal resources for instruction, and many more.
Conclusion: This study contributes to the practical-oriented learning, collaborative learning, and emphasis on student-centered pedagogy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of the CIPP model for quality evaluation at the school level: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553
Banks, J. A., & McGee, C. A. (2016). Multicultural education. John Wiley & Sons.
Baskota, P., & Koirala, B. (2024). Quality evaluation of one college using the CIPP evaluation model: A case study. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, 10(1), 1656–1678. https://doi.org/10.33492/JGLTEP10.1.2024.1656
Bhusal, D. R., & Bhandari, L. P. (2025). Perceptions towards English education program offered by Open and Distance Education Center at Tribhuvan University: A CIPP evaluation. Studies in ELT and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.3126/seltal.v2i2.74084
Bialystok, E. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bridge. (2025, April 11). English as a global language: The case for teaching different accents and dialects. Bridge TEFL. https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/english-global-language-teaching-different-accents-and-dialects/
Burns, A. (2021). Teaching English in a digital age: Opportunities and challenges. Routledge.
Burns, E. (2021). Metacognition – Intriguing concept for teachers in Nepal. Arena. https://arena.jamk.fi/en/arena-pro/metacognition-intriguing-concept-for-teachers-in-nepal/
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2022). National population and housing census 2021: Language report. Government of Nepal. https://cbs.gov.np
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dahal, B. (2022, March 5). Nepal needs new teaching methods for the new generation. Online Khabar. https://english.onlinekhabar.com/nepal-new-teaching-methods.html
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li Wei. (2019). Is multilingualism linked to a higher tolerance of ambiguity? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000570
Dhami, B. S. (2016, July 7). English teachers’ challenges in large classes in Nepal. NELTA ELT Forum. https://neltaeltforum.wordpress.com/2016/07/07/1080/
Dhami, B. S. (2022). Becoming an autonomous learner in the Nepalese EFL context: An autoethnographic study. KMC Journal, 4(2), 19–35.
DSM College. (2020). Foundations of language and linguistics (Course No. Eng. Ed. 416). Dharmasthali Secondary School. https://www.dsmc.edu.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Foundations-of-Language-and-Linguistics-316.pdf
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.
Gautam, G., & Poudel, T. (2025). Evaluation of interdisciplinary readings: M.Ed. first semester course using the CIPP model. Journal of Vishwa Adarsha College (JOVAC), 2(1), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.3126/jovac.v2i1.83893
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury.
Gnawali, L. (2016). Teacher development through reflective practice in Nepal. Journal of NELTA, 21(1–2), 90–99.
Gnawali, R. (2016). English language teaching in Nepal: Problems and prospects. Journal of Education and Research, 6(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v6i1.16173
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3–4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Herman, D. (2013). Storytelling and the sciences of mind. MIT Press.
K. C., R., & Baral, P. (2023). Applying the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model for course evaluation. KMC Journal, 5(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.3126/kmcj.v5i1.52460
Karki, M. (2020). Policy and practice of the teacher competency framework 2072 in Nepal. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/49270399/Policy_and_Practice_of_Teacher_Competency_Framework_2072
Khadka, S. R., & Luitel, B. (2021). Fostering social learning through collaborative classroom practices in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Pedagogy and Practice, 10(1), 87–104.
Khanal, B. (2021). Learning strategies used by public and private school students in Nepal. IRA-International Journal of Education & Multidisciplinary Studies, 12(2), 67–74. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aae6/59b9d0e53dea96cc164c5adba11c62ed81d6.pdf
Khanal, B., Panthi, R. K., Kshetree, M. P., Acharya, B. R., & Belbase, S. (2021). Mathematics learning strategies of high school students in Nepal. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00165-y
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
Neupane, M. (2010). Learner autonomy: Concept and considerations. Journal of NELTA, 15(1–2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v15i1-2.4617
Ömer Gökhan Ulum. (2016). Evaluation of English as a foreign language program using the CIPP (context, input, process, and product) model. Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.377
Panthee, D. (2020). Pre-service teacher education in Nepal: A qualitative study. National Center for Educational Development (NCED). https://ncenepal.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/PST-report-final-copy.pdf
Pareek, B., & Mathur, M. (2017). Salient features of Osho’s view on the role of the teacher. International Journal of Innovative Research and Review, 5(1), 5–21. Center for Info Bio Technology (CIBTech). http://www.cibtech.org/jirr.htm
Phyak, P. (2013a). Language ideologies and local languages as the medium of instruction policy: A critical ethnography of a multilingual school in Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.775557
Phyak, P. (2013b). Language policy and multilingual education in Nepal. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2013.817205
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press.
Priya, P. (2023). A program evaluation of M.Ed. English language education at Tribhuvan University. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 6(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.3126/craiaj.v6i1.55399
Rai, N., & Pradhan, M. (2020). The role of intersubjectivity in promoting critical thinking and knowledge exchange among Nepali students. Nepal Education Quarterly, 8(4), 98–115.
Rejina, K. C. (2023). Applying the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model for course evaluation. KMC Journal, 4(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.3126/kmcj.v4i2.52460
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Schaffner, J. (2021). Why programs fail: Lessons for improving public service delivery in Nepal (J-PAL Working Paper No. 6021). Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab. https://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/research-paper/working-paper_6021_Why-Programs-Fail-Lessons-for-Improving_Nepal_Nov2021.pdf
Shah, R. K. (2023). Evolving a model of critical pedagogy to deconstruct the hegemonic culture of the conventional teacher-centered social studies classroom. ILAM, 19(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.3126/ilam.v19i1.58599
Shah, S. (2023). Teacher hegemony and classroom practices in Nepal. Journal of Educational Practices, 15(2), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.3126/jep.v15i2.50021
Sharma, G. (2023). Analyzing classroom artifacts: Methods for studying collaborative learning in Nepali schools. Kathmandu University Educational Review, 14(3), 122–137.
Shrestha, N. (2024). An evaluation of the Master of Education in English Language Teaching (M.Ed. in ELT) of Kathmandu University, School of Education, using the CIPP model. ELE Praxis, 1(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.555
Shrestha, N., & Gurung, G. (2023). The digitalization of education in Nepal: A critical analysis. Theseus. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/799457/gurung_shrestha.pdf
Simply Psychology. (2025). Constructivism is a theory for teaching and learning. https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
Sopha, B., & Nanni, R. (2019). Evaluating English language teacher education programs in South Asia. Asian Journal of Education, 12(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.3126/aje.v12i1.24567
Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The CIPP model: Applications in language program evaluation. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 16(4), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chap. 2). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. The Guilford Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Szymanski, J. J., Chauhan, P. S., & Chaudhuri, A. A. (2025). LINE-1 retrotransposons as cell-free DNA biomarkers for multicancer early detection. Clinical Cancer Research, 31(7), 1179–1181. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-4051
Tan, S., Lee, N., & Hall, D. (2010). CIPP as a model for evaluating learning spaces. Swinburne University of Technology. https://figshare.swinburne.edu.au/articles/report/CIPP_as_a_model_for_evaluating_learning_spaces/26283793
Thapa, A. (2017). Critical thinking and practical criticism: An introduction to the course and proposed teaching strategies [Unpublished workshop paper]. Workshop of TU English Teachers, Tribhuvan University.
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model in the evaluation of training programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(Focus Issue–July), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, S., & Mhunpiew, N. (2024). A model for developing teacher leadership skills for university teachers in application-oriented universities in Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China. ABAC ODI Journal: Vision. Action. Outcome, 11(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2024.13
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, C. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.
