Blended Learning Management Platform for Strategic Educational Management Using Activity-Based Learning Techniques and AI Technology to Enhance Educational Leadership Competencies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: The objectives of this research were: 1) to develop a blended learning management platform on strategic educational management using combined activity-based learning techniques and AI technology to enhance educational administrator competencies; 2) to evaluate the platform’s efficiency against the 80/80 criterion and determine the effectiveness index and learning achievement with the platform; and 3) to study the opinions of experts and learners regarding learning with the platform.
Materials and Methods: This research employed a research and development methodology. The sample group consisted of 57 Master of Education students from Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, academic year 2024, using classrooms as the sampling unit. The target group comprised 10 educational innovation and technology experts, selected purposively. The research instruments included: 1) a learning achievement test; 2) an expert evaluation form for the platform's quality; and 3) a questionnaire on learners’ opinions regarding the platform. Statistical methods used for data analysis were percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test.
Results: The research findings revealed that the developed blended learning management platform on strategic educational management using combined activity-based learning techniques and AI technology to enhance educational administrator competencies had an efficiency of 81.23/82.46, which met the 80/80 standard criterion, and an effectiveness index of .8328. Learners who used the platform showed significantly higher post-learning achievement compared to pre-learning achievement at the .05 statistical significance level. The expert evaluation of the platform’s quality was at a high level, indicating that the platform is suitable for learners to enhance their educational administrator competencies. Learners also expressed high levels of satisfaction with the platform.
Conclusion: The research resulted in an efficient blended learning management platform on strategic education management to enhance educational administrator competencies, which is practically applicable and facilitates learners’ development in strategic education management as designed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Aad, S., & Hardey, M. (2025). Generative AI: Hopes, controversies, and the future of faculty roles in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(2), 267–282.
Adele, B., Ellinger, A. D., McWhorter, R. R., & Egan, T. M. (2023). Exploring learning outcomes for managers who coach. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(5/6), 635–652.
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45–51.
Anwar, F. (2019). Activity-based teaching, student motivation, and academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 154–170.
Atasoy, E., Bozna, H., Sönmez, A., Aydın Akkurt, A., Tuna Büyükköse, G., & Fırat, M. (2020). Active learning analytics in mobile: Visions from PhD students. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(2), 145–166.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22.
Dzulkifli, I., Asmawati, S., Fakhruddin, F. M., & Ahmad, N. D. (2021). Activity-based teaching of Quran for deaf students in the special education integration program. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(1), 1–16.
Fernández Cruz, F. J., Egido Gálvez, I., & Carballo Santaolalla, R. (2016). Impact of quality management systems on teaching-learning processes. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(3), 394–415.
Freyn, S. L., Sedaghatjou, M., & Rodney, S. (2021). Collaborative engagement experience-based learning: A teaching framework for business education. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(5), 1252–1266.
Huang, X., & Lai, C. (2020). Connecting formal and informal workplace learning with teacher proactivity: A proactive motivation perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(6), 437–456.
Ismaili, Y. (2021). Evaluation of students’ attitude toward distance learning during the pandemic (COVID-19): A case study of ELTE University. On the Horizon, 29(1), 17–30.
Kang, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence and its influence on adult learning in China. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(3), 450–464.
Kumar, K., & Vivekanandan, V. (2018). Advancing learning through smart learning analytics: A review of case studies. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(1), 1–12.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2019). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson Education Indochina.
Manoharan, K., Dissanayake, P. B. G., Pathirana, C., Deegahawature, D., & Silva, K. D. R. R. (2022). A curriculum guide model for the next normal in developing construction supervisory training programmes. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(5), 792–822.
Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2019). Higher Education Act B.E. 2562. Shipping and Parcel Printing Factory.
Mudkanna Gavhane, J., & Pagare, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence for education and its emphasis on assessment and adversity quotient: A review. Education + Training, 66(6), 609–645.
Mustapha, M. A., Gana, I. A., Waziri, M., Bukar, M. B., & Buba, M. A. (2021). Use of activity-based learning to improve students’ outcomes in basic education subjects. British Journal of Education, 9(1), 97–104.
Nkhoma, M. Z., Lam, T. K., Sriratanaviriyakul, N., Richardson, J., Kam, B., & Lau, K. H. (2017). Unpacking the revised Bloom’s taxonomy: Developing case-based learning activities. Education + Training, 59(3), 250–264.
Panjarattanakorn, D., Phakamach, P., Senarith, P., Dolprasit, S., Brahmawong, C., & Wachirawongpaisarn, S. (2023). Practical learning management system combined with case-based learning on educational resource administration in the digital era. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 4(2), 62–77.
Patra, S. K., Sundaray, B. K., & Mahapatra, D. M. (2021). Are university teachers ready to use and adopt an e-learning system? An empirical substantiation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 509–522.
Phakamach, P. (2023). Educational innovation: Elements and mechanisms for the development of Thai educational institutions towards internationalization. Journal of Education and Innovative Learning, 3(2), 161–180.
Phakamach, P., & Panjarattanakorn, D. (2024). The development of a blended learning management digital platform on entrepreneurship and ventures in education for graduate learners. Asian Education and Learning Review, 2(1), 1–16.
Phakamach, P., Senarith, P., & Wachirawongpaisarn, S. (2022). The metaverse in education: The future of immersive teaching & learning. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 3(2), 75–88.
Phakamach, P., Wachirawongpaisarn, S., & Panjarattanakorn, D. (2021). Development of an active learning management platform using constructivism on the topic of ICT systems and innovation for educational administration at the graduation level. Journal of Education and Innovative Learning, 1(3), 219–237.
Phangphol, P., & Phakamach, P. (2021). The development of a digital platform of an external educational quality assurance system for higher education in Thailand. Journal of Science Ladkrabang, 30(2), 25–41.
Ranjbarfard, M., & Heidari Sureshjani, M. (2018). Offering a framework for value co-creation in virtual academic learning environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(1), 2–27.
Sandanayake, Y. G., Samaraweera, A., & Ng, S. T. (2022). Guest editorial: KPIs to help develop the next normal in construction practice, teaching-learning, and research. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(5), 701–703.
Sankaranarayanan, S., Kandimalla, S. R., Cao, M., Maronna, I., An, H., Bogart, C., Murray, R. C., Hilton, M., Sakr, M., & Penstein Rosé, C. (2020). Designing for learning during collaborative projects online: Tools and takeaways. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 569–577.
Sinlarat, P. (2020). The path to excellence in Thai education. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 1(2), 60–75.
Thottoli, M. M., & Thomas, K. V. (2024). Unlocking the potential of smart learning: Exploring the impact of students’ technological factors on remote access. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(5), 1438–1452.
Yar, M. A., Yahya, A., Akbar, S., & Ramzan, A. (2023). Use of activity-based learning to improve students’ drive for knowledge & enhance their academic performance in the subject of forensic medicine: A cross-sectional survey from a private medical college of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Journal of Aziz Fatimah Medical & Dental College, 5(2), 61–66.