Leveraging Technology and Research to Shape Educational Policy

Main Article Content

Jhonie Gumilao
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9600-5683

Abstract

Background and Aim: Research investigates how technology together with research affects policy formation in the educational domain at Department of Education Region IX. The research explores outcomes from planning officers together with senior education program specialists operating at eight Schools Division Offices (SDOs) and the Planning and Research Unit. This research investigates how technological instruments together with research programs create policy frameworks based on evidence and overcome management obstacles in education. The investigation studies these elements to explore knowledge transfer processes which lead to policy-making progress. In particular, the study aims to examine how educational stakeholders in DepEd Region IX utilize technology to inform and shape policies that address regional challenges and enhance educational outcomes. The study also analyzes the role of research in the formulation and implementation of educational policies, focusing on its impact on curriculum development, technology integration, and policy effectiveness. Lastly, it identifies the key barriers and opportunities in adopting technology-driven approaches to educational policymaking, with an emphasis on teacher development, digital literacy, and inclusive learning strategies.


Materials and Methods: The research used qualitative investigation methods while thematic analysis allowed the evaluation of technology and research influences on educational policy development. The study obtained information from planning officers and senior education program specialists who work in both the Schools Division Offices and the Planning and Research Unit. Different methods of data collection were used to fully understand how policies get made which included both interviews and focus groups and document examination. Thematic analysis methods were used to detect regular patterns as well as main themes in the data regarding technology implementation together with evidence-based policy creation and organizational barriers.


Results: Research shows technology has powerful positive impacts on making decisions through data while it optimizes policy development while making it easier to execute. Technology dramatically influences educational policy development through improved customization of instruction and wider student enrollment opportunities and advanced educational content development and trained instructor capabilities. Students can receive training that specifically caters to their needs, skills, and learning styles with the use of educational technology. Policymakers can create regulations that support differentiated education by using data analytics, AI-driven exams, and adaptive learning systems to gain insights into student performance. Several obstacles stand in the way of maximum technology use because they include insufficient technological foundations alongside minimal resources and poor digital aptitude across relevant groups. The research study uncovered four main aspects including digital tool integration through policy processes and capability enhancing programs as well as institutional blockages to technology research application and essential research frameworks needed for decision-making.


Conclusion: Advanced technologies combined with research continue to affect multiple educational outcomes and the practices of teaching and professional development at DepEd Region IX. Modern educational technology allows personalized instruction and improves education accessibility for all students and enables analysis-based policy adjustments that guide curriculum transformation processes. Educational research acts as the main force which guides policy development and enables multidirectional collaboration between educational stakeholders to address regional problems and improve curriculum development. Through technology-based professional development programs educators have access to educational tools to combine teaching techniques and they share research information with peers through collaborative platforms. By improving technology teachers can acquire essential skills to manage changes in the educational environment which leads to an education system that promotes both inclusivity and competitiveness. This study holds significance because it provides foundational facts to policymakers who need knowledge regarding how technology supports balanced educational access. Stakeholders can develop educational policies through technology by combining barrier resolution with enabling factor maximization to meet the requirements of teachers and students. Research and technological integration should continue as critical components for developing sustainable educational progress so the Philippine education system maintains adaptation to global competition.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gumilao, J. (2025). Leveraging Technology and Research to Shape Educational Policy. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 2(3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2025.1429
Section
Articles

References

Alfonso, C. G. (2020). Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Learning Management Systems (LMS) in education: Tracking outcomes and resource allocation. Journal of Educational Technology and Policy, 12(3), 45–58.

Aliazas, J. V., & Fideli, H. (2024). Collaborative teaching practices and technology mindset on students' critical thinking abilities. International Journal of Research Publications, 98(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387546262

Anderson, R. M. (2020). The role of educational management information systems (EMIS) in enhancing equity and performance in schools. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 16(4), 12–23.

Bernardo, M. C., & Mendoza, L. P. (2018). Bridging the gap: Challenges and prospects in integrating research and technology in Philippine education policy. Philippine Journal of Educational Reform, 8(1), 67–82.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Evidence-based policy-making in education: The role of research in driving decisions. Educational Policy Studies Journal, 38(4), 567–590.

Celeste, R. J., & Osias, O. (2023). Challenges and implementation of technology integration: Basis for enhanced instructional program. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i2.2656

Cerda, J. Q. (2024). Contextual analysis of curriculum development in the Philippines: Progress and challenges. Global Scientific Journal, 12(11), 819-830

Cortez, R. N., Dela Cruz, M. P., & Santos, L. J. (2024). Aligning Philippine K to 12 assessment policies against international benchmarks. Philippine Journal of Science, 153(6B). https://philjournalsci.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf/pjs_pdf/vol153_No6B_Dec2024/aligning_Philippine_K_to_12_assessment_policies_against_Intl_benchmarks_.pdf

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dela Cruz, R. A. C. (2023). Assessment of the adaptive learning system implementation in selected private schools: Basis for enrichment. Cosmos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2). https://cosmosjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/CAHE-JJ23-121-11.-Ralph-Arjay-C.-Dela-Cruz.pdf

Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). ICT integration in Philippine education: Policies and reforms. Manila: DepEd.

DepEd. (2016). Basic Education Research Agenda. Department of Education.

DepEd. (2020). Digital literacy policy framework for Philippine schools. Department of Education.

Espinosa-Dublar, C. (2023). Assessing the impact of emerging technology integration on knowledge and skills acquisition of K–12 students in the Philippines: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Research Publications,98(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4355370

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.

Labesig, V. (2021, December 30). DepEd TV reaches 18 million young viewers. The Post. https://thepost.net.ph/news/nation/deped-tv-reaches-18-million-young-viewers/

Levin, B., Cooper, A., & Mascarenhas, S. (2018). The capacity challenge: What it takes for research to inform policy. Educational Researcher, 47(2), 101–110.

Lopez, R. D., & Mendoza, A. B. (2023). Effectiveness of Enhanced Basic Education Information System (EBEIS) and Learner Information System (LIS) in the Philippines. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies, 18(1), 692–705.

National Privacy Commission. (2021). Data privacy in Philippine education: A policy review. Manila: NPC.

Nutley, S. M., Davies, H. T. O., & Walter, I. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.

Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2013). Developing the use of research in practice. Social Policy and Society, 12(4), 545–559.

Ocampo, J. R., Cruz, D. L., & Reyes, T. C. (2020). Regional strategies for aligning national education policies with local implementation in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education Policy, 12(3), 33–50.

Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Corporation.

Torres, J. M., & Lopez, G. R. (2022). Barriers to integrating technology in education policymaking: The Philippine experience. International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership, 10(1), 22–36.

UNESCO. (2019). Global education monitoring report: Migration, displacement, and education – Building bridges, not walls. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education: A case study on the Philippines. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387743

Wong, K., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2019). Data-driven policymaking in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Leadership Review, 18(1), 45–59.