The Stabilizing Effect of Multimedia on ESL Spelling Retention: A Mixed-Methods Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: This research was conducted to stabilize the spelling retention of English as a Secondary Language (ESL) learners through a multimedia intervention combining weekly short videos that featured vocabulary spelling, pronunciation, definitions, and photos. This, with notebook writing and teacher-guided practice among grade 5 students.
Materials and Methods: The Action research paradigm guided the implementation of the intervention, encompassing planning, implementation, observation of outcomes, and reflection on results. Using an explanatory sequential design, quantitative data from 20 weeks of spelling scores from weekly assessments were analyzed and then explained further by the qualitative data from student focus groups, interviews, and teacher observation.
Results: Quantitatively, students' spelling performance remained stable with an average score of 7.40 out of 10 (SD = 0.68). Minimally, scores fluctuated, which indicates consistent retention rather than progressive improvement. The stable scores suggest that while the multimedia intervention maintained prior knowledge, additional strategies may be required to foster further improvement. The qualitative themes are varying engagement patterns, different multimedia design preferences, mixed perceived efficacy and learning outcomes, support systems, and content relevance and accessibility.
Conclusion: Multimedia interventions effectively stabilized spelling retention in ESL learners but did not indicate improved performance. This implies that there is a necessity for better optimization of multimedia with the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) by syncing text and visuals, reducing text density, and segmenting videos. Support for academically struggling students and exploring engagement strategies should be increased. More implications are for consistently using themed units for relevance, gamification for heightened motivation, and training educators on CTML and hybrid learning methods for proper and consistent application of the intervention. The connection between independent practice and guided support proved crucial to stabilizing the student performance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Abu Sayed Toyon, M. (2021). View of explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. Business and Social Science. https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1262/971
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35(6), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9016-7
Alobaid, A. (2021). ICT multimedia learning affordances: Role and impact on ESL learners' writing accuracy development. Heliyon, 7(7), e07517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07517
Alshahrani, H. A. (2019). Strategies to improve English vocabulary and spelling in the classroom for ELL, ESL, EO, and LD students. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2019.41
American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
Applied Doctoral Center. (2025). Action research resource. http://resources.nu.edu/c.php?g=1013605&p=8464648
Atapathy, S. (2019). Observation as a tool for collecting data. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 8(5[1]), 152. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371475537
Bainbridge, F. (2016). Apps-olutely brilliant: Can technology improve the spelling ability of primary school children? Language Studies Working Papers, 7, 36–49. https://www.reading.ac.uk/elal/-/media/project/uor-main/schools-departments/elal/lswp/lswp-7/elal_6_bainbridge.pdf
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2020). Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.).
Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., & White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Falmer Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496626
Caulfield, J. (2023). How to do thematic analysis. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis
Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2013). Students speak—Are we listening? A focus group toolkit. The University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program. https://www.ccsse.org/docs/SSBTN_FG_Handouts.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Erion, J., Davenport, C., Rodax, N., Scholl, B., & Hardy, J. (2009). Cover‐copy‐compare and spelling: One versus three repetitions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 319–330.
Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chorzempa, B. F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
Kosmac, A. M. (2010). Cover, copy, and compare: The analysis of a self-managed intervention to increase spelling accuracy across task and time [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Lessard-Clouston, M. (2013). Teaching vocabulary. TESOL International Association.
Mahdi, H. S., Mohsen, M. A., & Almanea, M. (2024). Multimedia glosses and second language vocabulary learning: A second-round meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104341
Malamed, C. (2024). Applying Richard Mayer’s Cognitive Theory Of Multimedia Learning. The eLearning Coach. https://theelearningcoach.com/learning/learning-theory-and-multimedia/
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112755
Mohsen, M. A., & Balakumar, M. (2011). A review of multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 247–258.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Reed, D. K., Petscher, Y., & Foorman, B. R. (2016). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and spelling to the reading comprehension of adolescents who are and are not English language learners. Reading and Writing, 29(4), 633–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9619-3
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sánchez, A., & Manchón, R. M. (2007). Research on second language vocabulary acquisition and learning: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), vii–xvi.
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Srirabut, P. (2023). The development of writing and spelling abilities of PrathomSuksa 3 students using multimedia. Journal for Developing the Social and Community, 10(2), 195–206. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdirmu/article/view/262335
Strong, B. (2023). Retrieval, repetition, and retention: Unveiling vocabulary acquisition strategies for ESL learners. Art Human Open Access Journal, 5(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.15406/ahoaj.2023.05.00206
Teng, M. F. (2022). The effectiveness of multimedia input on vocabulary learning and retention. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2131791
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press.
Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & John, D. S. A. (2016). Using visual aids as a motivational tool to enhance students’ interest in reading literary texts. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 1–7.
Zitha, I. (2024). Orthographic challenges encountered by fourth-grade English language learners in a rural-based South African primary school. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.6972