The 4 Mode Application Techniques Learning Model in Science Education: Analysis of Global Trends, Impacts, and Opportunities in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: The limited research and literature on implementing the 4 Mode Application Techniques (4MAT) instructional model in Indonesia makes it challenging for educators to obtain sufficient information on how to adapt this model within the local context. This study analyzes global trends, challenges, and opportunities of the 4MAT instructional model in science education within the Merdeka Curriculum framework.
Materials and Methods: The research employs a mixed-method approach, incorporating quantitative bibliometric analysis and qualitative systematic literature review using the PICOA framework. Data were collected from the Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Lens, and Google Scholar databases from 2014 to 2024.
Results: The findings indicate that the 4MAT instructional model encompasses five key concepts: instructional method implementation, learning models, learning styles, conceptual understanding, and teaching strategies. The 4MAT instructional model impacts mathematics and science education, which the Merdeka Curriculum can support through various aspects, including diverse learning styles and cognitive skills, cognitive approaches and memory reinforcement, student motivation and engagement, enhancement of critical thinking and creativity, collaboration and social skills, real-world relevance and sustainability, and a well-structured learning framework. Challenges in implementing the 4MAT instructional model include intensive teacher training, limited resources and infrastructure, time constraints and implementation complexity, student readiness and learning style diversity, complex assessment and evaluation processes, curriculum alignment, and topic limitations. However, the Merdeka Curriculum presents opportunities through continuous professional development, utilizing creative resources, flexibility in instructional planning, and adapting more inclusive and differentiated teaching strategies.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the 4MAT instructional model offers a thorough approach to improving math and science instruction that supports the Merdeka Curriculum. Despite implementation issues, its integration can support inclusive, engaging, and fruitful learning experiences when combined with professional development and adaptable strategies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Journal of Education and Learning Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Aktas, I., & Bılgın, İ. (2015). The effect of the 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th-grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.968536
AlAli, R. (2024). Enhancing 21st century skills through integrated STEM education using project-oriented problem-based learning. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 53(2), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217
Alanazi, F. H. (2020). The effectiveness of the 4MAT teaching approach in enhancing conceptions of electricity in physics for female students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 271–288.
Aliustaoğlu, F., & Tuna, A. (2022). Analysis of the pedagogical content knowledge development of prospective teachers in the lesson plan development process: 4MAT model. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.17
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Chittiwattanakorn, R., & Sookkheo, B. (2017). Using the 4MAT Model to promote learning achievement and connection skills on chemical reaction of the 10th grade students. Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.14456/rjes.2017.8
Demircioğlu, S., & Sezgin Selçuk, G. (2016). The effect of the case-based learning method on high school physics students' conceptual understanding of the unit on energy. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 17(2).
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (2003). Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn learning-style model research: Who, what, when, where, and so what? St. John’s University.
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Erşen, Z. B., & Güven, B. (2018). Examining mathematics teachers' views on 4MAT teaching model. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.56.4754
Eze, C. U., Egbo, J. J., & Okechineke, B. C. (2024). Effect of four–mode application technique on students’ interest in secondary school chemistry. ESUT Journal of Education, 7(1), 99–111.
Fickl, S., Dörfer, C. E., & Ziebolz, D. (2020). Impact of structured cooperative learning on student motivation and knowledge acquisition in dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 84(5), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12093
Firdaus, T., Wilujeng, I., Rahmawati, L., Nurohman, S., & Zahro, N. (2025). The 4 Mode Application Techniques Learning Model in Science Education: Analysis of Global Trends, Impacts, and Opportunities in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 2(3), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2025.1528
Haq, M. I. (2024). The effect of active learning strategies on student motivation in physics classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 12–21.
He, Y., Yu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Mapping knowledge domains of educational research using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 122(1), 1–28.
Herlinawati, N., Rohmah, N., & Syahid, A. (2024). Implementation of 4MAT model on science learning outcomes among junior high school students. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 5(1), 88–101.
Hibi, T. (2024). Neuroscientific perspectives on experiential learning: Implications for educational practice. Journal of Learning and Brain Research, 10(1), 44–61.
Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. (2024). Education transformation in Indonesia: Challenges and future directions under Merdeka Curriculum. Journal of Southeast Asian Educational Policy, 13(2), 35–50.
Ibenegbu, H. I., & Nzewi, E. (2020). Learning styles and academic performance in science among secondary school students. African Educational Review, 8(3), 112–126.
Ilkorucu, S., Karakuş, U., & Aydın, E. (2022). Implementation of the 4MAT instructional model to improve student engagement and science achievement. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11714
Ismael, A. (2020). Impact of instructional design on students’ conceptual understanding in chemistry. Middle East Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 22–30.
Ismael, A., Ali, M., & Yusuf, R. (2021). Blended learning in science classrooms: Trends and implications. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(3), 175–190.
Isreb, A., & Nag, N. (2006). Adaptation of learning styles in e-learning: The impact of personality and cognitive factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 273–287.
Jack, C., & Zubairu, M. (2022). Exploring the integration of neuroeducation principles in classroom management. African Journal of Cognitive Development, 9(2), 201–215.
Jasiah, M., Sutrisno, H., & Nurcahyani, E. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions on the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in rural schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 12–25.
Johnson, C. C., & Czerniak, C. M. (2023). Enhancing science instruction through pedagogical innovation and leadership. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 89–106.
Karno, B. P., Susanti, L. R., Hudaidah, H., & Farhan, F. (2024). Comparison of education in New Zealand and Indonesia in science subjects in primary school. FONDATIA, 8(4), 997–1010.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2209–2226.
Mariyono, D. (2024). Indonesian mosaic: The essential need for multicultural education. Quality Education for All, 1(1), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-05-2024-0042
Martinez, A. A., Ramirez, R., & Franco, M. A. (2017). Trends in learning styles and instructional design. International Journal of Instructional Technology, 4(2), 201–215.
Martínez, M. C., Rodriguez, H. A., & Garcia, P. (2018). Integrating neuroscience principles into the 4MAT instructional model. Journal of Brain-Based Learning, 12(1), 17–30.
McCarthy, B. (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT’s learning styles model. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 46–51.
McCarthy, B. (2000). About learning. Excel.
McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, D. (2006). Teaching around the 4MAT cycle: Designing instruction for diverse learners with diverse learning styles. Corwin Press.
McCarthy, B., McCarthy, D., & McCarthy, C. (1990; 2002). The 4MAT system: Teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques. Excel.
Mendikdasmen. (2024). Enam Program Prioritas Kemendikdasmen. https://gtk.dikdasmen.go.id/read-news/enam-program-prioritas-kemendikdasmen
Muttaqin, T. (2018). Determinants of unequal access to and quality of education in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 2(1), 1–23.
Nicoll-Senft, J. M., & Seider, S. N. (2009). Assessing the impact of the 4MAT teaching model across multiple disciplines in higher education. College Teaching, 58(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903245623
Nugraha, I. (2023). Unearthing the academic time capsule: Delving into the evolution of science education among Indonesian students. Journal of Science Learning, 6(4), 465–476.
Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., Firman, H., & Riandi, R. (2021). The urgency of STEM education in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i2.5979
Omoniyi, A. O. (2021). Relative effectiveness of computer simulation instructional package and four mode application technique in teaching difficult chemistry concepts in secondary schools in Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(6), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-6-5
ÖVEZ, F. T. (2012). The effects of the 4MAT learning model on learning achievement, retention, and attitude in chemistry education. Education and Science, 37(163), 115–131.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Panezai, R. A. (2022). Teachers’ perception and effectiveness of the 4MAT cycle-based instruction. Educational Innovations Journal, 10(2), 22–35.
Panezai, R. A., & Mahmood, A. (2022). Effect of 4MAT Cycle on the academic achievements of the students in the subject of biology at secondary level in Baluchistan. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10286351
Pinna, C. (2020). A systematic literature review of applications of the 4MAT model. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101638
Pratikno, Y., Hermawan, E., & Arifin, A. L. (2022). Human resource ‘Merdeka Curriculum’ from design to implementation in the school: What worked and what not in Indonesian education. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.1708
Sabry, P., Ismail, M., EL-Baaly, P., Ebrahim, A., & Risk, O. E. S. M. A. (2021). Using 4MAT Model to Develop First Primary Pupils’ Creative Thinking Skills in Science. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 7(3), 15–35.
Şalvarlı, Ş. İ., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). A systematic literature review of problematic gaming and Internet use among children and adolescents. Current Addiction Reports, 8(1), 16–38.
Sangchan, L., Chomsuwan, K., & Suamuang, W. (2022, December). Implementation of 4MAT for Personal Problem-Solving Skills Development in Production Process. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 814–817). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00151
Sani, M., & Salisu, A. (2023). Effect of Four Modes Application Technique on Academic Performance and Retention Among Senior Secondary Chemistry Students, Katsina State, Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (AJSTME), 9(5), 290–296.
Şeker, B. S., & Övez, F. T. D. (2018). The integration of the 4MAT teaching model with the interdisciplinary structure: A new model proposal and test. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1767–1790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82986
Somsak, S., Chairat, S., & Wannasri, N. (2023). Effects of 4MAT instruction on science learning outcomes of primary students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 12(1), 44–55.
Syahriani, D., & Yufriadi, D. (2023). The effectiveness of 4MAT learning model on students’ cognitive achievement in science. Journal of Educational Science and Innovation, 11(2), 121–133.
Syarif, A., Nugroho, R. A., & Zainuddin, M. (2023). Rethinking instructional strategy in science learning in Indonesian schools: A practical and conceptual review. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 34–49.
Tezcan, M., & Güvenç, G. (2017). The effects of 4MAT system based on experiential learning on science learning performance. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(7), 1653–1671.
Thadee, W., Chumphorn, C., & Tangswad, S. (2024). Enhancing science literacy using 4MAT model among Thai elementary students. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 65–77.
Tumanguil, C. M. (2021). Effectiveness of the 4MAT instructional model in teaching physics concepts to senior high school students. Philippine Journal of Education, 98(2), 20–35.
Ursin, J. (1995). Brain-based learning: How to engage all students in deep learning. Educational Horizons, 74(1), 35–38.
Uyangör, N. (2012). The impact of 4MAT learning styles on students’ academic achievement and motivation in chemistry education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 954–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.234
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Wamendiktisaintek. (2025). Analisis Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Inovasi Teknologi, 9(1), 101–120.
Xi, Y., Zhang, Q., & Wang, H. (2024). Effectiveness of 4MAT model on student engagement in blended learning environments. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00312-6
Yanti, S., Azhari, B., & Satriawan, M. (2021). Evaluation of 4MAT application to enhance analytical thinking among middle school students. Journal of Innovation in Science Education, 7(3), 90–103.
Yuwanita, Y., Anggraeni, E., & Supriyatna, A. (2020). Designing physics learning using 4MAT model for conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655, 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012045
Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004–2021): Towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2022-0090
Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2024). Effects of 4MAT strategy on learning retention in chemistry education. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(1), 101–114