Assessing the Level of Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies Among Criminology Students

Main Article Content

Jay O. Dunggo-an
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2601-3205
Annielaine S. Gulam
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3219-5161
Ryan Chris J. Pantilgan
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2381-9587
Daisy Catubig
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5920-2278

Abstract

Background and Aim: Reading comprehension is essential as it significantly impacts a student's life and serves as the foundation for learning. In Criminology, strong reading skills enable students to understand legal frameworks, engage with theoretical concepts, evaluate research, analyze policies, communicate effectively, and think critically about complex issues related to crime and justice. This study examines the levels of reading comprehension and the reading strategies used by Criminology students at a private college in Pagadian City during the 2024-2025 academic year.


Materials and Methods: This study employs a descriptive quantitative research design involving 113 Criminology students from a higher education institution in Pagadian City during the 2024-2025 academic year. The first tool used is the Reading Comprehension Test developed by Yan (2011), consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions based on four passages. The second tool is the Reading Strategies Checklist, also created by Yan (2011), which helps participants in reading and answering questions, ranging from 1 to 30 items.


Results: The researchers used the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate the relationship between reading strategies and reading comprehension among BS Criminology students. The results indicated that participants had poor reading comprehension, with an average score of 35.58%. In contrast, their reading strategies score was 1.77, categorized as "Good." Despite this, the analysis revealed no significant relationship between reading strategies and comprehension, as evidenced by a p-value of 0.903, which exceeds the conventional significance threshold of 0.05. Consequently, it can be concluded that reading strategies do not significantly impact reading comprehension in this group of students.


Conclusion: Remedial and enrichment activities in English language literacy and incredibly dedicated reading time on Fridays are crucial for enhancing students' comprehension and preparing them for law enforcement careers. Teachers can support this by providing relevant reading materials and assigning reporting tasks. Future research should focus on qualitative studies that explore the experiences of Bachelor of Science in Criminology students. In-depth interviews can reveal the connections between their academic journeys and personal development, offering valuable insights into their lived experiences in the field.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dunggo-an , J. O. ., Gulam , A. S. ., Pantilgan, R. C. J. ., & Catubig, D. . (2025). Assessing the Level of Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies Among Criminology Students. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 2(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2025.1356
Section
Articles

References

Abdelhalim, I. (2017). The effectiveness of integrating Habits of Mind (HoM) in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Education, 3(3), 45–56.

Alenizi, M. A. (2019). The effect of reading strategies on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 12(3), 1–10.

Almutairi, S. (2018). The effects of reading fluency on reading comprehension among intermediate EFL students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(6), 203–209.

Al-Tatari, M. (2016). The level of reading comprehension skills of students with learning disabilities in Jordan. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361795007

Anjulo, A. K. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive reading in teaching reading comprehension. Addis Ababa University.

Bales, S. (2018). Literacy and poverty: Evidence and implications for policy. Adult Learning, 29(4), 147–155.

Banditvilai, C. (2020). The effectiveness of reading strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 46–50.

Churchill, D., Yeomans, H., & Iain, C. (2022). Renewing historical criminology: Scope, significance, and future directions. Annual Review of Criminology, 6, 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-035516

Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Gilbert, J. K., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Exploring the relationship between text complexity and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(4), 237–254.

Deluao, J. G., Manlapaz, R. T., & Divina, M. I. (2022). Improving students’ reading comprehension using explicit instruction in text structure. International Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 55–66.

Elleman, A. M. (2017). The role of inferencing in reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 168–179.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based strategies for improving reading outcomes for students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 23(4), 213–235.

Gunn, A. A. (2018). Low literacy and adult learners: Issues of self-esteem. Journal of Adult Education, 47(2), 29–35.

Hansen, C. (2019). The effect of sustained silent reading on vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(3), 295–313.

Hassan, R. A. (2024). Quantitative research design in education: Applications and implications. Educational Measurement and Statistics Journal, 14(1), 12–24.

Helarde, J. (2021). Reading as the mother of all study skills. Manila Journal of Language Studies, 5(2), 10–18.

Hollowell, D. (2021). Teaching reading skills in criminology. Journal of Criminology and Education, 3(1), 22–30.

Hollowell, D. (2023). Components of reading instruction and classroom strategies. Reading Educator Journal, 8(1), 67–76.

Ismail, N. M., & Tawalbeh, A. (2015). Investigating students' reading difficulties. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 577–586.

Jones, M. (2018). The importance of vocabulary in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Today, 33(1), 15–19.

Junkie, R. (2021). Reading strategies checklist for educators. Retrieved from https://www.readingstrategieschecklist.org

Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215625640

Kolness, M. (2018). Using small group reading instruction to improve reading fluency in first grade. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 1–10.

Kung, L. Y., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). Action research on metacognitive reading strategies instruction to improve reading comprehension. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2020.92.86.94

Lampi, J. P., Armstrong, S. L., Talwar, A., & Magliano, J. P. (2023). Reading matters in supporting students: The role of complex literacy tasks in academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251231214557

LoBello, A. (2021). Silent reading and vocabulary development in elementary education. Reading Horizons, 6(2), 121–137.

Manlapaz, R. T., Cabahug, S. M., & Divina, M. I. (2022). Contextualized learning materials for enhancing reading comprehension during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology and Education, 6, 1269–1276.

Master Class. (2021). Reading to write: How good reading habits boost writing skills. Retrieved from https://www.masterclass.com

Miller, J. (2020). The impact of sustained silent reading on student literacy. Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 123–145.

Nair, G., & Feroze, M. (2022). Effectiveness of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) discussion as a learning enhancer in conventional lecture class. Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, 15(4), 1–6.

Nieporent, M. (2021). Building fluency through repetition: The case for echo and chorus reading. Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 15–24.

PISA. (2018). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Polat, M. (2020). Analysis of multiple-choice versus open-ended questions in language tests. Novitas-ROYAL, 14(1), 87–101.

Requiso-Jimenez, L. A., & Bascos-Ocampo, M. A. (2022). The role of reading in mental and cultural development. Philippine Journal of Reading Research, 10(3), 45–52.

Rubinstein, M., & Kroese, D. P. (2016). Stratified sampling. In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/stratified-sampling

Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The importance of four skills in language teaching. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(1), 29–31.

Shewan, D. (2022). How reading improves writing. Retrieved from https://www.writingstrategies.org

Son, A. P., Tinapay, A. O., Tirol, S. L., Samillano, J. H., & Cortes, J. A. L. (2022). Reading proficiency level of Grade 2 learners in modular distance learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 5(3), 66–73.

Street, A. (2020). Reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language Development, 12(2), 59–70.

Thomas, R. (2023). Stratified sampling in educational research: Applications and best practices. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17(4), 205–218.

Tinapay, A. O., & Tirol, S. L. (2021). Social learning perspectives in school policies. Natural Volatiles & Essential Oils, 8(5), 9666–9686.

Tinapay, A. O., Desabille, I. N., Tirol, S. L., & Samillano, J. H. (2023). TPACK and competencies of research teachers: A literature review. European Chemical Bulletin, 12(4), 3140–3160.

Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral progression approach in the K to 12 science curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Education (IJE), 10, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.5121/ije.2022.10403

Tomas, L., Santiago, M. R., & Vinas, R. J. (2021). Reading comprehension challenges in Philippine basic education. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 11–19.

Turney, J. (2024). Understanding correlation in education research. Educational Research Methods Journal, 20(2), 34–46.

UNESCO. (2017). Measuring SDG 4: How PIRLS can help. Paris: UNESCO.

Ventic, J., & Eslit, E. (2018). Reading fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary competence: Basis for a reading enhancement program. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323959177

Villarin, J. R., & Patlunag, G. S. (2023). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension among junior high school students. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 89–97.

Willingham, D. T. (2017). The role of inference instruction in comprehension improvement. American Educator, 41(2), 12–18.

Yan, B. (2011). Reading Comprehension Test and Strategy Checklist (unpublished). Nanjing University.