Participatory Communication: Challenges in Developing Educational Quality in Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • Pattama Laksanayothin Graduated School, Suan Dusit University
  • Supasiri Boonpraves Graduate School, Suan Dusit University
  • Venus Skunhom Graduate School, Suan Dusit University
  • Pitauk Chancharoen Graduate School, Suan Dusit University

Keywords:

Participatory Communication, Higher Education Institutions, Participation, Organizational Communication

Abstract

This academic article aimed to present knowledge about participatory communication in higher education institutions with a focus on its challenges in developing educational quality. The content covered definitions, significance, fundamental theories, forms and methods, applications, challenges, and analysis. The key findings from this study revealed that participatory communication in higher education was a two-way interactive communication process that allowed all stakeholders to exchange information, opinions, and perceptions. It was based on Paulo Freire's dialogic education theory, UNESCO's development communication theory, and Habermas's public sphere theory. Participatory communication was important for higher education institutions in building participatory culture, strengthening community relations, developing educational quality, and creating organizational image. Higher education institutions can implement participatory communication through various channels including digital media, face-to-face communication, and print media. Success factors included leadership, personnel development, organizational culture building, and effective monitoring and evaluation systems. However, higher education institutions faced significant challenges in developing participatory communication, including organizational structure, stakeholder diversity, and organizational culture to make participatory communication an important mechanism for educational quality development.

References

Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9265-2

Bessette, G. (2004). Involving the community: A guide to participatory development. Canada: International Development Centre.

Elsharnouby, T. H. (2015). Student Co-creation Behavior in Higher Education: The Role of Satisfaction with the University Experience. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(2), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2015.1059919

Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

Iordache-Platis, M., & Josan, I. (2009). Communication efficiency within higher education institutions: The case of Romania. European Research Studies, 12(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/220

Jacobson, L. T. (2003). Participatory communication for social change: The relevance of the theory of communicative action. Annals of the International Communication Association 27(1), 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679023

Jooste, J., & van der Vyver, C. (2014). Participatory communication and perceptions amongst staff members at a tertiary education institution. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(7), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n7p631

Kunsch, M. M. K. (2003). Planejamento de relações públicas na comunicação integrada [Public relations planning in integrated communication]. Summus Editorial.

Men, L. R. (2014). Strategic internal communication: Transformational leadership, communication channels, and employee satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914524536

Singhal, A. (2001). Facilitating community participation through communication. UNICEF.

Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2005). Participatory communication: The new paradigm. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte (Eds.), Media & global change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 91–103). Nordicom; CLACSO.

Tufte, T., & Mefalopulos, P. (2009). Participatory communication: A practical guide. The World Bank.

Welch, M. (2012). Appropriateness and acceptability: Employee perspectives of internal communication. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.017

White, C., Vanc, A., & Stafford, G. (2010). Internal communication, information satisfaction, and sense of community: The effect of personal influence. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260903170985

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Laksanayothin, P., Boonpraves, S., Skunhom, V., & Chancharoen, P. (2026). Participatory Communication: Challenges in Developing Educational Quality in Higher Education Institutions. Suan Dusit Graduate School Academic Journal, 22(2), 165–178. retrieved from https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SDUGSAJ/article/view/1478

Issue

Section

Academic article