Analysis of Laboratory skills and Chemical Preparation of Student of Packaging and Material Technology Program, Faculty of Agro-Industry

Authors

  • Wassana Sanguansil The Center for Scientific and Technological Equipment, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80160, Thailand
  • Tuangporn Peakhom The Center for Scientific and Technological Equipment, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80160, Thailand

Keywords:

GelRed®, SYBR® Safe, brightness, mean gray value

Abstract

Ethidium bromide is commonly used to stain DNA in molecular biology laboratories. Because this chemical can efficiently intercalate with nucleic but ethidium bromide is a mutagenic compound. Despite its advantages, its reputation as a mutagen activated the development of many alternative agents for safety reasons.  Prior to use these alternative chemicals, however, the comparative study of DNA staining effectiveness between the alternatives and Ethidium bromide is needed to be quantified.  In this study there were two commercial alternatives, GelRed® and SYBR® Safe, used to compare the effectiveness of DNA staining with Ethidium bromide. The brightness of DNA bands that appeared in agarose gel after electrophoresis were compared between the treatments of different staining agents, 15 wells each.  The gels were then taken photos under UV light, and the mean gray value of each DNA band was using Adobe Photoshop software to represent the brightness of each band.  The result indicated that the DNA staining effectiveness of the agents was different (p<0.0001).  Both alternative agents showed brighter DNA band under UV light rather than Ethidium bromide (p<0.0001 for both pairs) but they show no difference from each other (p=0.5570).  This study suggested that GelRed® and SYBR® Safe can be effectively used instead of ethidium bromide to reduce toxic waste, as well as to promote safety standards in the laboratory according to the standard of the Enhancement of safety Practice of Research Laboratory in Thailand (ESPReL).

References

โครงการยกระดับมาตรฐานความปลอดภัยห้องปฏิบัติการวิจัยในประเทศไทย. (2557). คู่มือการประเมินความปลอดภัยห้องปฏิบัติการ ฉบับแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพมหานคร.

Behzad, H., Kaan, Y., Mohammad, A. Z., Susana, R. C., Inderjeet, T., Shilpi, A., & Vinod, K. G. (2016). Adsorption of ethidium bromide (EtBr) from aqueous solutions by natural pumice and aluminium-coated pumice. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 21.

Biotium. (2008). Ethidium Bromide: The Alternatives. Retrieved from https://bitesizebio.com/417/ethidium-bromide-the-alternatives-2/

Biotium. (2013). GelRed-and-GelGreen-Safety-Report. Retrieved from https://biotium.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GelRed-and-GelGreen-Safety-Report.pdf

Breaker, R. R., & Joyce, G. F. (2014). The expanding view of RNA and DNA function. Chemical Biology, 21(9), 1059–1065.

Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13–15.

Frank, J. J. (1994). Basic methods for the detection of PCR products. Genome Research, 3, S77–S82.

Gherghi, I. C., Girousi, S. T., Voulgaropoulos, A., & Tzimou-Tsitouridou, R. (2004). Interaction of the mutagen ethidium bromide with DNA, using a carbon paste electrode and a hanging mercury drop electrode. Analytical Chimica Acta, 505(1), 135–144.

Jeppson, J. O., Laurell, C. B., & Bi, F. (1979). Agarose gel electrophoresis. Clinical Chemistry, 25(4), 629–638.

Mikhail, G., Xue, L., Candice, P., Wai-Y, L., & Lori, R. (2017). Biotium; Glowing Products for Science™ (pp. 1-4).

Möller, M., & Cronk, Q. C. B. (1997a). Origin and relationships of Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae). American Journal of Botany, 84, 956–965.

Pinar, K., & Oguz, O. (2013). Ethidium bromide binding to DNA cryogels. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 73(3), 442–450.

Zarrintaj, P., Ahmadi, Z., Vahabi, H., Ducos, F., Reza, S. M., & Mozafari, M. (2018). Polyaniline in retrospect and prospect. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(7), 15852–15860.

Downloads

Published

23-09-2025

How to Cite

Sanguansil, W. ., & Peakhom, T. . (2025). Analysis of Laboratory skills and Chemical Preparation of Student of Packaging and Material Technology Program, Faculty of Agro-Industry. CUAST Journal, 14(3), e2468. retrieved from https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CUASTJournal/article/view/2468