Essence of CPTPP: Legal Notes Relating to Thailand's Request for Accession

Authors

  • Thanachart Paliyawate Faculty of Law, Ramkhamhaeng University

Keywords:

CPTPP, Accession, Commitments, Regional Free Trade Area

Abstract

This article aimed to present basic information, legal basis and mechanism of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and to analyze legal issues directly related to Thailand's request for negotiation to access CPTPP. The qualitative research by documentaries found several vivid advantages of accession into regional multilateral agreement and the most concerned impact or damage against industries being not ready for opening market to foreigners and abiding by new developing covenants. By law, Thailand can be simultaneously signatory of several agreements and former contracting agreements can be further applicable to Thailand. In the accession process, Thailand's offer in line with at least 3 specified benchmarks was uneasy task. Meanwhile, several contracting parties had entered into side letters in specific subjects separated from CPTPP but non-contracting countries neither refer nor gain their benefits. Accordingly, Thailand's public sector should consider proper Non-conformity Measures, General Notes, Offset and Transitional Measures to be included in Thailand's offer through negotiation under procedure in benefit of such unready industries, conduct research in each industry and brainstorming to provide Thailand's offer indicating readiness and potential pursuant to the 3 benchmarks under original and new-developed terms and manage confusion and inaccurate operation arising from overlap and complexity caused by simultaneous commitments in several agreements as well as prepare for side letters made in necessary industries.

References

กรมเจรจาการค้าระหว่างประเทศ. (2563, 18 มิถุนายน). สรุปสาระสำคัญ CPTPP 30 ข้อบท. [Online]. Available: https://dtn.go.th/th/negotiation/สรุปสาระสำคัญ-cptpp-30-ข้อบท?cate=5ee98b8def41401a28504172. [2563, มิถุนายน 26].

กรมเจรจาการค้าระหว่างประเทศ. (2563, 16 มิถุนายน). สมาชิก RCEP เดินหน้าเจรจาเต็มพิกัดมั่นใจลงนามความตกลงปลายปีนี้แน่นอน. [Online]. Available: https://www.dtn.go.th/th/news/สมาชิก-rcep-เดินหน้าเจรจาเต็มพิกัด-มั่นใจลงนามความตกลงปลายปีนี้แน่นอน. [2563, มิถุนายน 26].

กรมเจรจาการค้าระหว่างประเทศ. (2556). ความตกลงการเป็นหุ้นส่วนทางเศรษฐกิจภาคพื้นแปซิฟิก (TPP). [Online]. Available: http://www.thaifta.com/thaifta/Home/FTAbyCountry/tabid/53/ctV/detail/id/24/mid/480/usemastercontainer/true/Default.aspx. [2563, พฤษภาคม 24].

กรุงเทพธุรกิจ. (2561, 26 พฤษภาคม). เปิดเวที "โอกาสการค้าลงทุนในเม็กซิโก" หลังมูลค่าส่งออกไทยเพิ่มสูงขึ้น [Online]. Available: https://wwww.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/803031. [2561, พฤษภาคม 21].

จุมพต สายสุนทร. (2552). หนังสือสัญญาระหว่างประเทศที่ต้องได้รับความเห็นชอบจากรัฐสภา. รายงานการศึกษาฉบับสมบูรณ์เสนอต่อสถาบันรัฐธรรมนูญศึกษา สำนักงานศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ

ทัชชมัย (ฤกษะสุต) ทองอุไร. 2560. กฎหมายเศรษฐกิจระหว่างประเทศ GATT และ WTO: บททั่วไป.พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 5. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์วิญญูชน.

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. (2019, March 28). APEC Taking Measures to Boost Trade and Regional Growth. [Online]. Available: https://www.apec.org/Press/News-Releases/2019/0328_СТ1. [2020, May 28].

Corr, C. F. et al. (2019, January 21), The CPTPP Enters into Force: What Does it Mean for Global Trade?, White & Case LLP. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/cptpp-enters-force-what-does-it-mean-global-trade. [2020, June 30].

Government of Canada. (2019, September). Canada - Thailand Relations. [Online]. Available: https://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/thailand-thailande/bilateral_relations.bilaterales/canada-thailand-thailande.aspx?lang=eng . [2020 September 22].

Hunter, R. and Seidel, S. (2017, February 21). The Pros and Cons of Bilateral and Multilateral Trade Agreements. Trade Crossroads (A Blog by Baker McKenzie). [Online]. Available: https://tradeblog.bakermckenzie.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-bilateral-and-multilateral-trade-agreements/. [2020, September 22].

Jozepa, I., Ward, M. and Webb, D. (2019). Future Free Trade Agreements: US, CPTP, Australia and New Zealand. UK: House of Commons Library Briefing No. 8499.

Mulgan, Aurelia G. (2018, February 28), CPTPP a Boost for Japan's Regional Trade Leadership. East Asia Forum. [Online]. Available: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/02/27/cptpp-a-boost-for-japans-regional-trade-leadership/. [28 May 2020].

New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade. (2019). CPTPP Accession Process. [Online]. Available: https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/CPTPP/Accession-Process.pdf. [2020, May 26].

New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade. (n.d.). Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership text and resources. [Online]. Available: https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/cptpp/comprehensive-and-progressive-agreement-for-trans-pacific-partnership-text-and-resources/#side. [2020, May 24].

Ono, Y. (2018, May 1). Thailand wants to join TPP 'as Soon as Possible', Says Deputy PM, Nikkei Asian Review. [Online]. Available: https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Thailand-wants-to-join-TpP-as-soon-as-possible-says-deputy-PM. [2020, June 10].

Schule, U. and Kleisinger, T. (2016). The Spaghetti Bowl: A Case Study on Processing Rules of Origin and Rules of Cumulation, Paper No. 2/2016 UASM Discussion Paper Series, University of Applied Science Mainz.

Sinclair, S. (2018, February 12). A Detailed Look at the New, Decidedly Not-so-progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership. Behind the Numbers Blog of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. [Online]. Available: http://behindthenumbers.ca/2018/02/12/backgrounder-new-decidedly-not-progressive-trans-pacific-partnership/. [2020, June 30].

UK Department of International Trade. (2019). Public consultation on the UK potentially Seeking Accession to CPTPP: Summary of Responses. London: DIT.

US Council on Foreign Relations. (2019). What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)?. [Online]. Available: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp. [2020, May 24].

World Bank Group. (2018). Enhancing Potential. Washington D.C.: IBRD.

World Trade Organization. (2020). Regional Trade Agreements. [Online]. Available: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region._e/region._e.htm. [2020, June 10].

World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO. [Online]. Available: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/scope_rta._e.htm. [2020, June 10].

Downloads

Published

2021-02-15

Issue

Section

Academic article