ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF RAJASANKHAVATTU AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL LEADERSHIP IN A DEMOCRATIC REGIME

Main Article Content

Thanawat Chaopho

Abstract

The political leadership in a democracy is a crucial element in driving the system forward, playing a significant role in determining the direction of society and ensuring justice in the political process. A leader in a democratic regime is not only expected to represent the people but must also possess the ability to guide the society toward sustainable development in various fields, including economics, social affairs, education, and culture. In contrast, ethical leadership that is responsible to society helps build trust in the political process and fosters strong cooperation between the people and the leaders. Especially in democratic systems with diverse opinions and interests, the development of political leadership requires learning and adapting in various aspects, such as open communication, listening to public opinions, and practicing fairness. The Buddhist principle of Rajasankhavatthu has been developed and applied in governance to enhance the relationship between leaders and the people through approaches that emphasize public service, polite speech, and beneficial actions to society.


Rajasankhavatthu is based on Buddhist teachings that not only promote good relationships within families and society in general but can also be applied in governance to foster leaders with moral values and the capability to manage societal challenges in an effective democratic environment. Integrating Rajasankhavatthu with the development of political leadership not only reinforces moral values and social virtues but also contributes to the understanding of creating an equitable and just society, which is a core principle of democracy (Greenleaf, 1977). This article aims to explore and discuss the application of Rajasankhavatthu in developing political leadership in a democracy through in-depth study of its social and governance-related uses, including case studies both from domestic and international contexts to provide insights into developing and strengthening quality political leadership.

Article Details

Section
Academic article

References

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press.

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press.

Haque, M. S. (2002). The world of governance: A critical analysis. International Political Science Review, 23(3), 315-330.

Hicks, A. M. (1999). Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Cornell University Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.

Ingham, S. (2021). Representative Democracy and Social Equality. American Political Science Review, 115(2), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000279

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

Schmidt, M. G. (2001). The Democratic Welfare State [Essay]. https://www.pass.va/content/dam/casinapioiv/pass/pdf-olumi/acta/acta-6/acta6-schmidt.pdf

Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.

Viviani, L. (2024). Leadership and Democracy: A Political Sociology. Springer.

Royal Acts of Doing Favours (n.d.). Retrieved from https://so07.tci- thaijo.org/index.php/JSSD/article/view/9005

สังคหวัตถุ 4. (n.d.). In พจนานุกรมพุทธศาสตร์. Retrieved from https://84000.org/tipitaka/dic/d_item.php?i=186

Wikipedia contributors. (2021, May 3). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Worlds_of_Welfare_Capitalism

The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Worlds_of_Welfare_Capitalism

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP.