The Relationship Between Self-Management Skills and Creative Thinking Skills of Science Teachers in Catholic Primary Schools in the Eastern Region

Authors

  • Kamollanate Kullatumpaiboon St Teresa International University, Thailand
  • Vichian Puncreobutr Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education, St Theresa International University, Thailand
  • Perumel Karnan Independent Researcher
  • Areenat Kaewwaewnoi Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education, St Theresa International University, Thailand
  • Sirima Pinyoanuntapong Independent Scholar

Keywords:

Self-Management Skills, Creative Thinking Skills, Science Teachers, Catholic Schools

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) examine the level of self-management skills (SM) among science teachers in Catholic primary schools in the Eastern Region, overall and by dimension; (2) assess their creative thinking skills (CT) using EFA-derived factor scores for Fluency, Originality, Flexibility, and Elaboration; (3) analyze relationships between SM and CT, both overall and by SM dimension; and (4) identify which SM dimensions predict each CT factor. The sample included 104 teachers selected from a population of 340 using Krejcie and Morgan’s (1970) table. A three-part questionnaire collected demographic data, SM, and CT measures. Exploratory Factor Analysis confirmed a four-factor CT structure consistent with theory. Reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) were calculated for each subscale: Fluency (0.656), Originality (0.529), Flexibility (0.608), and Elaboration (0.446), reflecting the multidimensional nature of creative thinking. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson correlation, two-way ANOVA, and stepwise regression. Results showed high levels of both SM and CT across all dimensions. SM was positively correlated with Flexibility (r = 0.368, p < 0.01), Fluency (r = 0.254, p < 0.01), and Originality (r = 0.265, p < 0.01), but not Elaboration. Gender and age showed no significant effects on CT. Regression analysis identified Achievement Orientation and Responsivity (AO&R) as the only significant predictor, specifically for Flexibility (β = -0.418, p < .001, R² = 0.175).

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Srisaard, B. (2017). Introductory research (10th ed.). Suvirasarn.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge.

Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2017). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lakhana Sariwat. (2021). The relationship between self-management and creative thinking among private school teachers in southern Thailand. Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, 32(3), 45–58.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. Battelle for Kids.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press.

Piyaporn Suksawat. (2023). Organizational climate and teacher creativity in private schools: A quantitative study. Journal of Thai Education, 20(1), 112–127.

Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). American Psychological Association.

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350

Sutthipong Hoksuwan. (2020). Self-management and job satisfaction among primary school teachers. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 14(2), 33–47.

Teerawut Bunyasopon. (2022). Effects of a creativity development program on science teaching skills of primary school teachers. Journal of Education, Naresuan University, 24(4), 78–93.

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21