Political Utility Management to Develop a Political Marketing Strategy

Authors

  • วิเชียร พรมแก้ว Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Surindra Rajabhat University, Thailand.
  • Athimart Permpoon Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Surindra Rajabhat University, Thailand.
  • Sanya Kenaphoom Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/ajld.2024.10

Keywords:

Political Utility, , Political Marketing, Strategy

Abstract

Developing a strategic political marketing plan requires political utility management. Political marketers can effectively prioritize efforts, allocate resources, and optimize overall strategy by methodically evaluating the potential costs and benefits of different campaign actions and tactics. This strategy makes sure that campaigns work for the interests of society as a whole in addition to winning elections, which promotes a stronger and more functional democratic governance system. The purpose of this study is to analyze political marketing strategies based on the concept of political utility. Political marketing strategies based on the concept of political utility include: (1)  Political Ethical Conduct, (2) Audience Understanding, (3) Strategic Positioning, (4)  Political Message Clarity, (5) Multi-channel Engagement, (6) Data-Driven Decision Making, (7) Agile Adaptation, (8) Issue Advocacy, (9) Coalition Building, (10) Long-term Vision. In conclusion, the results emphasize ethical behavior, audience comprehension, strategic positioning, message clarity, multi-channel engagement, data-driven decision-making, agile adaptation, issue advocacy, coalition building, and long-term vision as essential elements of political marketing strategies based on the idea of political utility. Together, these components highlight how crucial it is to coordinate campaign activities with more general political goals to maximize efficacy and produce long-lasting effects in the domains of elections and governance.

References

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Garrard, J. (2004). Politicians, policies, and political marketing: On the campaign trail in the UK. Manchester University Press.

Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (2006). Political trust and electoral behaviour: A comparative study. Electoral Studies, 25(1), 125-145.

Lees-Marshment, J. (2014). Political marketing: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Luo, Y., & Hsieh, J. J. (2007). Ethical concerns in international marketing: A review and research agenda. International Marketing Review, 24(1), 7-34.

Newman, B. I., & Chansarkar, B. (2020). Handbook of political marketing. Routledge.

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.

Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy—and what news outlets can do about it. Harvard Kennedy School, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Working Paper Series, (2).

Scammell, M. (1995). Designer politics: How elections are won. Palgrave Macmillan.

Shepsle, K. A., & Bonchek, M. S. (1997). Analyzing politics: Rationality, behavior, and institutions. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2010). Political public relations: Old practice, new theory-building. In The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Reputation (pp. 359-378). Wiley-Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

19-12-2024

How to Cite

พรมแก้ว ว., Permpoon, A. ., & Kenaphoom, S. . (2024). Political Utility Management to Develop a Political Marketing Strategy. Academic Journal of Local Development, 3(2), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.14456/ajld.2024.10