The Implementation of TAI Learning Activities to Enhance Student Achievement in Social Studies at Huakhiew Wittayalai School
Keywords:
Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Social Studies, Iddhipāda Dhammas, Student Achievement, Learning ManagementAbstract
This study explores the implementation of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model in enhancing student achievement in social studies at Huakhiew Wittayalai School, Khon Kaen Province. The primary focus is on teaching the "Principles of Life" according to the Four Iddhipāda Dhammas, central to Buddhist moral education. This research adopts a mixed-methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The sample consists of 21 Grade 3 students, with data collected through pre-tests, post-tests, satisfaction surveys, and teacher interviews. The pre-test and post-test comparisons reveal significant improvements in students' academic performance following the TAI intervention. Students demonstrated a deeper understanding and application of the Four Iddhipāda Dhammas after engaging in TAI learning activities. The post-test scores were statistically higher than pre-test results, confirming the model’s effectiveness in promoting academic growth. Additionally, the satisfaction survey indicates high levels of student engagement and enjoyment. Students appreciated the collaborative nature of TAI, which allowed them to work in teams while receiving individualized support, leading to a more dynamic learning experience compared to traditional methods. Teacher feedback also highlighted the positive effects of TAI on student participation, although challenges such as the need for additional planning time and managing group dynamics were noted. This research provides empirical evidence of TAI’s potential in transforming social studies education, especially in the context of moral education, by fostering student-centered learning and enhancing academic outcomes. It also underscores the importance of providing teachers with the necessary resources and professional development to successfully implement cooperative learning models. The findings contribute to the growing discourse on innovative teaching practices in Thailand, offering practical insights for educators aiming to improve student achievement and engagement in social studies. Future research should explore the long-term effects of TAI in various educational contexts, including its applicability to other subjects and its impact on retention and knowledge transfer.
References
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
Jensen, E. (2013). Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind: Practical Strategies for Raising Achievement. ASCD.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon.
Ministry of Education. (2010). National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and Amendments (Second National Education Act B.E. 2545 (2002)). Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Phonphai, T. (2020). Enhancing Moral Education in Thailand: The Impact of Team Assisted Individualization on Student Outcomes. Journal of Moral Education, 49(3), 345-361.
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Insights into Modern Education (i-ME)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.