Developing a Teaching Kit for Promoting Coexistence in Society Based on the Four Brahmavihāra Dhammas Using a Creative CAI Model for Lower Secondary Students

Authors

  • Rungnapha Yondan Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Khon Kaen Campus, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Keywords:

Teaching module, Creative CAI model, Four Sublime States of Mind, learning outcomes, cooperative learning

Abstract

This research aims to (1) develop a teaching module and (2) compare the learning outcomes before and after using the teaching module on the topic of "Living Together in Society According to the Four Sublime States of Mind (Brahmavihāra)" through the use of a Creative CAI (Computer-Assisted Instruction) model for Grade 8 students at Yang Talat Wittayakarn School in Kalasin Province. The sample group consisted of 36 Grade 8 students. The research tools used included the teaching module, an achievement test, and a behavior assessment form. The statistics used in the research were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test analysis. The research findings were as follows: (1) In the development of the teaching module, students had a moderate level of foundational knowledge about living together in society according to the Four Sublime States of Mind through the Creative CAI model. After the teaching session, students were able to answer the Dhamma-related test questions effectively. (2) A comparison of pre- and post-learning outcomes using the teaching module on "Living Together in Society According to the Four Sublime States of Mind" through the Creative CAI model revealed that the students' post-learning test scores were significantly higher than their pre-learning scores at the 0.05 level of statistical significance. (3) The development of the teaching module on "Living Together in Society According to the Four Sublime States of Mind" through the Creative CAI model, after the learning session, showed that students' behaviors related to learning through the module, particularly in terms of cooperative learning, teaching approach, content simplicity, and assessment, were rated at the highest level across all aspects.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Brophy, J. (2006). History and principles of student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 3–27). Routledge.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.

Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34–37.

Ministry of Education. (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Office of the Basic Education Commission.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press.

Raths, L., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. (1966). Values and teaching: Working with values in the classroom. Merrill.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wattanapitayakul, C. (2021). The development of a teaching module and the effects of learning management on living together in society based on the Four Sublime States of Mind. Journal of Educational Innovation, 13(2), 112–126.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Yondan, R. (2024). Developing a Teaching Kit for Promoting Coexistence in Society Based on the Four Brahmavihāra Dhammas Using a Creative CAI Model for Lower Secondary Students. Insights into Modern Education (i-ME), 1(4), 1–8. retrieved from https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IME/article/view/572

Issue

Section

Research Paper