Marx and Engels' idea of "real man" and its contemporary value - Using the German Morphology as a reference
Keywords:
realistic people, The German Form, Anthropological thoughtAbstract
As the theoretical cornerstone of historical materialism, Marx and Engels systematically constructed the theory of "real man" in German Ideology through the critical transcendence of Hegel's speculative philosophy, Feuerbach's humanism and Stirner's individualism. The theory establishes its ontological provisions from three dimensions: the practical subject engaged in material production, the historical bearer of social relations, and the successor of life reproduction, thus constituting a scientific basis for analyzing the law of human social development. In contemporary practice, this theory presents three value dimensions: transforming into people-centered institutional design at the governance level, guiding the construction of a community of life between man and nature at the level of civilization, and promoting the practice of a community with a shared future for mankind at the global level, all of which jointly point to the ultimate value goal of "all-round human development". Its theoretical construction and practical extension provide fundamental value coordinates and practical guidelines for the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era.
References
Arboleda, M. (2025). Friedrich Engels on development and nature: rethinking ecology beyond Western Marxism. Review of International Political Economy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2459630
Brixel, P. (2024). The unity of Marx’s concept of alienated labor. Philosophical Review, 133(1), 33-71. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-10935339
Buissink, K. (2023). The Proletariat in Marx and Engels' Critique of Capitalism, 1842–1848. Science & Society, 87(1), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2023.87.1.95
Gan, F., & Bai, Q. (2023). Karl Marx’s thoughts on critical pedagogy, reproduction, and aesthetic literacy in STEAM education and praxis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(13), 1513-1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2197208
Garlitz, D., & Zompetti, J. (2023). Critical Theory as post-marxism: The Frankfurt school and beyond. In (Vol. 55, pp. 141-148): Taylor & Francis.
Gong, Y. (2023). The Chinese Path to Modernization and Its Implications for the World: A Historical Perspective. International Critical Thought, 13(2), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2024.2331394
Halikias, D. (2024). The Young Marx on Feudalism as the Democracy of Unfreedom. The Historical Journal, 67(2), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x23000493
He, Z., & Wang, C. (2024). Understanding the Unique Characteristics and Essential Requirements of Chinese Modernization. International Critical Thought, 14(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2024.2331394
Hunter, I. (2025). Creative Disintegration: The Perpetual Emergence of Modern Political Thought. History and Theory, 64(2), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12376
Leonid, G., & Anton, G. (2023). Historical materialism: Does the concept have a future? Social Evolution & History, 22(1), 143-178. https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2023.01.07
Li, Q., & Ma, Y. (2023). Sinicization Innovation of Marxist Humanistic Theory in Colleges and Universities Under the Background of Innovative Thinking. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1897-1909. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S405168
Ling, F. (2024). The importance of the English language for the early Engels–a comparison between Engels’ and Marx’s research on English political economic literature before their collaboration. New Political Economy, 29(2), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2242272
Liu, J. (2024). Is domestic labor productive labor: an inquiry based on historical materialism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2024.2442557
Magness, P. W., & Makovi, M. (2023). The Mainstreaming of Marx: Measuring the effect of the Russian Revolution on Karl Marx’s influence. Journal of Political Economy, 131(6), 1507-1545. https://doi.org/10.1086/722933
Moore, H. (2023). German idealism and the early philosophy of SL Frank. Studies in East European Thought, 75(3), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-022-09463-4
Ostrowski, M. S. (2024). ideology and the individual. In (Vol. 29, pp. 1-25): Taylor & Francis.
Peters, M. A., Neilson, D., & Jackson, L. (2022). Post-marxism, humanism and (post) structuralism: Educational philosophy and theory. In (Vol. 54, pp. 2331-2340): Taylor & Francis.
Peters, M. A., Wang, C., Zhen, H., Zhongying, S., Xiangping, S., Chen, L., Xin, Y., Yulian, F., Kefei, X., & Fei, W. (2022). Contemporary Chinese Marxism: Social visions and philosophy of education–An EPAT collective project. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(10), 1550-1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1993824
Rosenberg, P. (2023). The Hegelian Structure of Marx’s Thought. Critical Review, 35(4), 332-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2023.2316456
Shen, X., & Hou, X. (2023). Harmonious coexistence and ceaseless nourishment: The Sinicized Marxist concept of development. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(8), 921-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2175669
Zhen, H. (2023). Constructing a modern theoretical system of education with Chinese characteristics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(8), 903-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2175667
