Word Stress Errors in Polysyllabic Words: Effects of Syllable Number and Word Familiarity Among Thai EFL Learners
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the effects of syllable number (2-, 3-, 4-syllable words) and word familiarity on English word stress production among Thai EFL learners, using polysyllabic words with neutral affixes that do not affect stress placement in the word list. The participants were 20 third-year English major students in Chiang Rai, Thailand, who had basic knowledge of stress production in two-syllable, three-syllable, and four-syllable words due to completed courses in Introduction to Linguistics and Phonology. They were required to be at the B1 level or lower by taking the CEFR level test from the British Council Global. The data were collected by giving participants a task to read aloud 60 polysyllabic words (30 familiar, 30 unfamiliar) in isolation to test word stress production. The results revealed that the number of syllables had a significant effect on participants’ word stress placement, with more syllables resulting in more stress placement errors due to increased complexity. Moreover, word familiarity also had a significant effect on word stress placement, as the unfamiliar word set had a higher error rate than the familiar word set. Participants tended to avoid using Thai stress patterns to pronounce the given words since they probably had phonological awareness. However, participants showed a tendency to apply Thai stress patterns to unfamiliar words automatically when they did not know how to pronounce those words, following the Thai stress pattern that participants were used to.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The opinions and content expressed in the articles are solely those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Authors are fully responsible for the accuracy and correctness of their work.
Any reuse, reproduction, or redistribution of the articles, content, data, or images in other forms requires prior written permission from the Vacana Journal.
References
Armijos, K., & Guzmán, P. (2024). Metalinguistic awareness in EFL classrooms [Undergraduate thesis, Universidad de Cuenca]. Universidad de Cuenca Institutional Repository. https://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/45225
British Council. (2025, March 13). Free English online level test. https://englishonline.britishcouncil.org/free-english-level-test-cefr-2/
Chantaraphat, Y., & Jaturapitakkul, N. (2023). Use of peer tutoring in improving the English speaking ability of Thai undergraduate students. rEFLections, 30(3), 826–849. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i3.268771
Isarankura, S. (2018). The effects of stress and tones in Thai on the pronunciation of English polysyllabic loanwords among Thai EFL students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 11(2), 66–83. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/161528
Jaiprasong, S., & Pongpairoj, N. (2020). L2 production of English word stress by L1 Thai learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2), 142–157. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/243699
Karjo, C. H. (2016). Accounting for L2 learners’ errors in word stress placement. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 199–208. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/1344/938
Khamkhien, A. (2010). Thai learners’ English pronunciation competence: Lesson learned from word stress assignment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.757-764
Nguyen, L., Hung, B., Duong U., & Le, T. (2021). Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about pronunciation instruction in tertiary English as a foreign language education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739842
Nuraini, L., Hastini, H., & Mertosono, S. (2024). Decoding the suprasegmental aspect: A deep dive into word stress errors in English pronunciation. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 3(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v3i1.209
Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Oxford 3000 and 5000 word lists. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/wordlists/oxford3000-5000
Piyapattaranop, C. (2020). Stress patterns and metalinguistic knowledge before and after praxis intervention on the pronunciation of English derivational suffixed words by Thai learners [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/435/
Plansangket, C. (2016). Word stress errors of graduate students in Thailand: A study of CEIC program [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University Digital Collections. https://doi.org/10.14457/TU.the.2016.1272
Soontornpiwat, S. (2023). The recognition and production of English word stress of Thai university students. Asia Social Issues, 16(5), e256125. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.256125
Tangtorrith, N., & Pongpairoj, N. (2022). Systematicity of L2 interlanguage of stress assignment in English compound nouns and phrasal verbs by L1 Thai learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 33–63. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/256713