Decentralization and Democratic Governance: A Comparative Study of Local Government Reforms in Southeast Asia
คำสำคัญ:
decentralization, democratic governance, Southeast Asia, local government reform, public participationบทคัดย่อ
This paper explores the relationship between decentralization and democratic governance through a comparative analysis of local government reforms in Southeast Asia. The study examines how decentralization initiatives have been implemented in countries such as Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos, considering historical, political, and institutional contexts. Drawing on empirical studies and policy analyses, it evaluates the effectiveness of decentralization in improving governance outcomes, including transparency, accountability, citizen participation, and public service delivery. The research highlights the diverse impacts of decentralization across different governance systems, noting both positive outcomes—such as enhanced local autonomy and increased civic engagement—and challenges including corruption, inadequate institutional capacity, and uneven resource distribution. Case studies reveal that while some reforms have empowered local governments and communities, others have reinforced central control or created new avenues for elite capture. Special attention is given to the localization of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and how decentralized governance structures contribute to—or hinder—achieving inclusive and sustainable development. The study concludes that for decentralization to foster democratic governance, reforms must be context-sensitive, supported by strong legal frameworks, and coupled with active civil society engagement. The findings offer policy recommendations aimed at strengthening decentralization processes in Southeast Asia and advancing equitable and participatory governance.
References
Bingol, H. B. (2016). Paradiplomacy and protodiplomacy in world practice: A comparative case study of conflict and international development in Quebec, Catalonia and Kurdistan. https://core.ac.uk/download/231826616.pdf
Björkhagen, M. (2016). Understanding illiberal peace-building: An analysis of conflict, peace and reconciliation in North Maluku Province, Indonesia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/289939665.pdf
Cook, B. R., Satizábal, P., & Curnow, J. (2021). Humanising agricultural extension: A review. World Development, 140, Article 105337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105337
Buchenrieder, G., Dufhues, T., Munkung, N., Theesfeld, I., et al. (2025). The political economy of decentralization in Thailand - Does decentralization allow for peasant participation? https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6699190.pdf
Castella, J.-C., Lestrelin, G., Pham Thu Thuy, Phanvilay, K., et al. (2013). The context of REDD+ in the Lao People's Democratic Republic: Drivers, agents and institutions. https://core.ac.uk/download/84829506.pdf
Chen, J., Priamarizki, A., & Sebastian, L. C. (2014). Indonesia beyond Reformasi: Necessity and the “de-centering” of democracy. https://core.ac.uk/download/56360397.pdf
Dekker, A. J., & Holverda, S. (2002). Decentralisation and legitimacy: A reading list. https://core.ac.uk/download/388698262.pdf
Ferrazzi, G., & Rohdewohld, R. (2022). Emerging practices in intergovernmental functional assignment. https://core.ac.uk/download/534900185.pdf
Gianan, E. R. (2018). Reclaiming “People Power”: Prospects for renewed civil society engagement and democratic governance. https://core.ac.uk/download/287611927.pdf
Gonzalez, E. T., & Mendoza, M. L. (2025). Governance in Southeast Asia: Issues and options. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6370777.pdf
Halimatusa’diyah, I. (2019). The politics of women’s health: Decentralization, state capacity, and maternal mortality disparities. https://core.ac.uk/download/224978005.pdf
Hammarlund, E. (2015). Divide and conquer: Political decentralization and secessionist suppression in Indonesia and the Philippines. https://core.ac.uk/download/216862285.pdf
Kirana, G. (2014). Decentralization dilemma in Indonesia: Does decentralization breed corruption? https://core.ac.uk/download/232736737.pdf
Eckardt, S. (2025). Political accountability, fiscal conditions, and local government performance – Cross-sectional evidence from Indonesia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7070703.pdf
Ginsburg, T. (2020). Authoritarian international law? American Journal of International Law, 114, 221–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.202

Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 วารสารวิชาการสังคมศาสตร์สมัยใหม่ (Online)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.